Re: [NSIS] draft-ietf-nsis-qspec and emergency-rsvp

Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com> Wed, 14 October 2009 12:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jgunn6@csc.com>
X-Original-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766E43A69EB for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.485
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.113, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GlXF14eywCwd for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail170.messagelabs.com (mail170.messagelabs.com [216.82.253.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5668C3A69E8 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: jgunn6@csc.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-170.messagelabs.com!1255523144!18484956!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.1.3; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [20.137.2.87]
Received: (qmail 3782 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2009 12:25:45 -0000
Received: from amer-mta101.csc.com (HELO amer-mta101.csc.com) (20.137.2.87) by server-13.tower-170.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 Oct 2009 12:25:45 -0000
Received: from amer-gw09.amer.csc.com (amer-gw09.amer.csc.com [20.6.39.245]) by amer-mta101.csc.com (Switch-3.3.3mp/Switch-3.3.3mp) with ESMTP id n9ECPgI4003766; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:25:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <A8544E0F-1EFC-4D8E-AEAB-1D6EA9FFE40A@cisco.com>
To: Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes 652HF83 November 04, 2004
From: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Message-ID: <OF668B345A.DCA15A10-ON8525764F.00441799-8525764F.00444423@csc.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:25:38 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on AMER-GW09/SRV/CSC(Release 8.0.1 HF996|December 23, 2008) at 10/14/2009 08:27:19 AM, Serialize complete at 10/14/2009 08:27:19 AM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0044438D8525764F_="
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 06:12:59 -0700
Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, NSIS <nsis@ietf.org>, cornelia.kappler@googlemail.com, "Carlberg, Kenneth G." <KENNETH.G.CARLBERG@saic.com>, David R Oran <oran@cisco.com>, "(IJ/ETH) Attila Báder" <Attila.Bader@ericsson.com>, "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, g.karagiannis@ewi.utwente.nl
Subject: Re: [NSIS] draft-ietf-nsis-qspec and emergency-rsvp
X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsis>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:25:45 -0000

I take it back. 

 My mind must be going.  I was confusing the NSIS documents with the DIME 
documents.

My deepest apologies for causing confusion.

Janet

This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please 
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in 
delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to 
any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement 
or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such 
purpose.



Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com> 
10/14/2009 04:56 AM

To
"(IJ/ETH) Attila Báder" <Attila.Bader@ericsson.com>, 
g.karagiannis@ewi.utwente.nl, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, 
cornelia.kappler@googlemail.com, David R Oran <oran@cisco.com>
cc
Le Faucheur Francois <flefauch@cisco.com>, "Carlberg, Kenneth G." 
<KENNETH.G.CARLBERG@saic.com>, "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, Gorry 
Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, NSIS <nsis@ietf.org>, Janet P 
Gunn/USA/CSC@CSC
Subject
draft-ietf-nsis-qspec and emergency-rsvp






Folks,

draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-21 (now expired) specifies the <Admission 
Priority> and <RPH Priority>. It also refers to emergency-rsvp in 
several places (e.g. in IANA section for extended RPH registry).

Janet indicated that changes may be in the works in regards to those. 
Could you update us on the NSIS qspec plans wrt to:
                 * <Admission Priority>
                 * <RPH Priority>
                 * references to emergency-rsvp
?

This is so we ensure we have appropriate references back from 
emergency-rsvp to nsis-qspec.

Thank you

Francois