[NSIS] A benchmarking draft, but signaling terminology
Feher Gabor <feher.gabor@tmit.bme.hu> Fri, 04 July 2003 03:26 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA01767 for <nsis-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 23:26:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19YHD1-0003XD-3A for nsis-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 23:26:04 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h643Q32v013579 for nsis-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 23:26:03 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19YHCz-0003Wu-FR; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 23:26:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Y6MF-0004Hy-Vx for nsis@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 11:50:52 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA19159 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:50:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Y6ME-00011z-00 for nsis@ietf.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 11:50:50 -0400
Received: from david.tmit.bme.hu ([152.66.246.102]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Y6M9-00010y-00 for nsis@ietf.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2003 11:50:47 -0400
Received: from ttt-atm.tmit.bme.hu (ttt-atm.tmit.bme.hu [152.66.246.81]) by david.tmit.bme.hu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h63FoKej010211; Thu, 3 Jul 2003 17:50:20 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from TTT-ATM/SpoolDir by ttt-atm.tmit.bme.hu (Mercury 1.48); 3 Jul 03 17:50:48 +0100
Received: from SpoolDir by TTT-ATM (Mercury 1.48); 3 Jul 03 17:50:14 +0100
Received: from dzsessz.tmit.bme.hu (152.66.244.14) by ttt-atm.tmit.bme.hu (Mercury 1.48) with ESMTP; 3 Jul 03 17:48:36 +0100
Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.0.20030703173656.02ae64d8@goliat.eik.bme.hu>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 17:48:11 +0200
To: nsis@ietf.org
From: Feher Gabor <feher.gabor@tmit.bme.hu>
Cc: ifreytsis@cetacean.com, robert.hancock@roke.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Subject: [NSIS] A benchmarking draft, but signaling terminology
Sender: nsis-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: nsis-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
dear all, In the Benchmarking Working Group (BMWG) we have produced a draft about benchmarking routers supporting resource reservation. Some weeks ago we have updated the terminology draft that targets distinguished traffic, QoS sessions, resource reservation capable routers, protocols, etc.. We have tried to make the draft as much 'NSIS conform' as possible. Luckily, our thoughts about resource reservation are really close to yours, so it was not a break. Please take a look at on the draft: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bmwg-benchres-term-03.txt We would appreciate any question or comment! regards, Gabor _______________________________________________ nsis mailing list nsis@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis