Re: [Ntp] List of NTPv4 issues

Heiko Gerstung <> Wed, 11 September 2019 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DC9120854 for <>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 03:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.289
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jzjTEYt8bBDk for <>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 03:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08F5312085D for <>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 03:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41CA371C0690; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:10:16 +0200 (CEST)
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 41CA371C0690
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;; s=mail201101; t=1568196618; bh=qeE/5BJXYVSWgRW8FGk1XxwuwWpVxKMxH74KiyRTo3Q=; h=Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Mime-version:From: To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=KtB77Ar/pM5ZkRXHJYv2y2UCpLRrIC4JvZewT5T50nSDn2aZOqY8BG5VEkz0FgODp EQENwaCN+Y/6XXD6USw6uuogKewDims8SUrPVRspg4ZoMP9kvhF5lPP7kp0coralhP qIpwUH5WSw6CkjPzqY0jpUTEf25g69bib2iZdUbs=
X-Kerio-Anti-Spam: Build: [Engines:, Stamp: 3], Multi: [Enabled, t: (0.000007,0.007903)], BW: [Enabled, t: (0.000007)], RTDA: [Enabled, t: (0.176299), Hit: No, Details: v2.7.55; Id: 15.1i6g44f.1dkfsqlbc.2au4], total: 0(700)
X-Footer: bWVpbmJlcmcuZGU=
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1c.0.190812
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:10:11 +0200
Message-ID: <>
Thread-Topic: [Ntp] List of NTPv4 issues
References: <20190910114446.GD21704@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20190910114446.GD21704@localhost>
Mime-version: 1.0
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3
Thread-Index: AZ2x3tU+ODc0NGUxOGYyNDcyNzFmNA==
From: Heiko Gerstung <>
To: Miroslav Lichvar <>, "" <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at server1a
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] List of NTPv4 issues
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:10:24 -0000

Hi Miroslav, 

great job, thanks a lot for this! 

Best Regards,

Heiko Gerstung 
Managing Director

MEINBERG® Funkuhren GmbH & Co. KG
Lange Wand 9
D-31812 Bad Pyrmont, Germany
Phone:    +49 (0)5281 9309-404
Fax:        +49 (0)5281 9309-9404

Amtsgericht Hannover 17HRA 100322
Geschäftsführer/Management: Günter Meinberg, Werner Meinberg, Andre Hartmann, Heiko Gerstung


Do not miss our Time Synchronization Blog: 

Connect via LinkedIn:

On 10.09.19, 13:46 "ntp im Auftrag von Miroslav Lichvar" < im Auftrag von> wrote:

    With the recent discussions about extension fields and NTPv5,
    I thought it would be good to track all known issues of NTPv4 with
    their potential solutions, so we can better decide if/when we need to
    start working on NTPv5 and what changes it should actually have.
    I've created a page on the IETF wiki:
    If you think we do need NTPv5 and see an issue that is not listed
    on the page, please add it, or respond here so someone else can add
    Miroslav Lichvar
    ntp mailing list