[Ntp] My thoughts on flags

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Tue, 23 July 2019 04:38 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B60C120041 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 21:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OgaYR6QU9oce for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 21:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0A1F120033 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 21:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id h28so28288919lfj.5 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 21:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=h31LBe8eA7kyJOVzJnhjuh8UMF6egQ0vrG4afoJky2o=; b=X3lbf3CQwoxWeMuFKK2mL8pUqIfCyp7kU4a8ISl+G+mrMMTQYmkMTNib5lnNPjE/sP syhutTeqqnmkLBexnOFEWLtmbpGgTyxQ9OmD9m3W0t3hMMMOfxgppL8uYg8W8qkJgQ/g sx6J7w1RWxjq72g1uruqgSeGq3DBMYIgFFagCgRVF8a+x616pDxREf3NGAPFakFUFXe9 F3ujKPIS9d8OMuKW3yTqnkckvKXF81FUvub2f2+K7t0ekOtT2edavddAqX0VTgnmLeGw GzHCwSGRx4J+RKRWH0jhUnrZId9zZ51QfDnrMTX620avtdTIZk9knBEE/MNmGIWwW5nf 02GA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=h31LBe8eA7kyJOVzJnhjuh8UMF6egQ0vrG4afoJky2o=; b=NSzS+dtHIPfgTloqS7BTqCxheu3yGoTSoYiDJC8wtnBe9nP+ZQSRM8PXWO/U07fNZe plZLVY0o1Ykr/Xtv9j80gpdWfbYJhP/BksLYZ7H1DajptR7/6Cvc/LBfeEcwhWYRY+rx tmHR0NjBltdlNRzOUS3IFqu7YgKG75fvrSXLBCH5gPQfmKJF93Ss3u9HHHFNx64xBzC8 XxGqj9ADx6M5qtVqU6LC6k6palONIsApgYCYrghiobSax0JbbFXUXvxe4EQtJHPKkT+r l7KAnFQw0+Da667MIYHYrnWX++kkDafRaRZyh6Xr0kI28rs/TiA1rrV59MzpqgH5Zjtv BMBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUxJ6XqJhxhdsc4snqjfLA9e890kM/MolWXU0FDODjIvgjLjok6 NvAo2pwQIRJjOtXlmoxiu2KgBCKJhkBilhZ3WvVNK6e6QsM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzNaJzplEhWdZhT1wSqTdZ2eKiafQdhMhiDumL2WhutnWJXgiVslLZ3qCP1fjoB41g1gpgsNbs0GRnDQ/4v3aE=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:51ab:: with SMTP id f11mr20676198lfk.55.1563856689439; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 21:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 21:37:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0c=KTv8KncL43Y_K-M5fe8vpNYSOAfYU6FD2VTtjDKNg_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/7g6cF-qmLPs1DTHDJBF5D_EG-Y8>
Subject: [Ntp] My thoughts on flags
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 04:38:14 -0000

Dear all,

One of the items on the agenda that didn't really discussed was a
number of drafts: draft-stenn-ntp-i-do-06,
draft-stenn-ntp-extension-fields-09,
draft-stenn-ntp-leap-smear-refid-00. All of them are masterworks of
repurposing fields, adding structure to hitherto unstructured
identifiers, and other tricks beloved of

And none of them are necessary. Autokey should be dispenced with now
that we have NTS. An NTS-KE exchange can easily be extended to include
information about server features, and in event of changes a rejection
of cookies can force a new NTS-KE exchange. This exchange can also
include smeared time, which wouldn't be necessary if we represented
timestamps in a format like MJD+seconds since midnight or somesuch
(even UTC if properly understood).

I would like to see us adopt the attitude of the web community where
new features are gated on TLS support to spur adoption.

Sincerely,
Watson