IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Whatever happened to the last call on draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp?

"Patrik Fältström " <paf@frobbit.se> Tue, 04 June 2019 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A357312004D for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=frobbit.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D3FFomgKWUFx for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9824120041 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 06:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [77.72.226.235] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:0:fd95:6da2:1db6:54af]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3CD328366; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:05:22 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=frobbit.se; s=mail; t=1559653522; bh=cya1y8WLY/nb4jXN3CRaTSrGLG7KdzIZtqQTcGcQVMA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wWDzzKr3fDRljHYNMFzR70ttqiPFP7I4mjI6EZ9kvhwf+ZsktyieXc1muiwianIcr AxDcfpPAI1y0F8/9hOmfMpksSZtRYjVDEX5s6kP6ngchA7IGroDC3xP+84C1YQBSUz MW53mmtllyyiuUNo6ddkA8aKXt7rsjZWpCiBbARg=
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
To: Watson Ladd <watson=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:05:22 +0200
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.5r5635)
Message-ID: <096A1D24-20B6-4116-99AD-9463E3C50627@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <CAN2QdAGOsN8FtdukCbPwT8EVJCQRw2UQS4n8E5aQcNnWNY3iqQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN2QdAGOsN8FtdukCbPwT8EVJCQRw2UQS4n8E5aQcNnWNY3iqQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_MailMate_3F974120-89D0-4D95-A3E8-25B26246C000_="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/8Uip8ZRwFBhdqZF-YUkE18zLfjg>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Whatever happened to the last call on draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp?
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 13:05:29 -0000

FWIW, I support Watson in this question. Are we done? Is something missing?

   Patrik

On 24 May 2019, at 23:50, Watson Ladd wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I just realized my inbox is rather empty right now. Are we planning to conclude this last call at the virtual interim? It seems like there is not much more to say.
>
> Sincerely,
> Watson
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email