[ntpwg] Antw: Re: Comments on draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-08

"Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Thu, 04 May 2017 06:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BAF12954B for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 May 2017 23:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YJ1ruHTJRWBN for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 May 2017 23:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (psp3.ntp.org [185.140.48.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB8E1294B5 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 3 May 2017 23:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psp3.ntp.org (localhost.ntp.org [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5759E86DB18 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 06:17:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (fortinet.ntp.org [10.224.90.254]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67A886D55E for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 06:17:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rrzmta2.uni-regensburg.de ([194.94.155.52]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>) id 1d6A4q-000MG3-30 for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Thu, 04 May 2017 06:17:33 +0000
Received: from rrzmta2.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 746C072D41 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 08:17:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by rrzmta2.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA7369C0C for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Thu, 4 May 2017 08:17:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 04 May 2017 08:17:21 +0200
Message-Id: <590AC770020000A10002615E@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 14.2.2
Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 08:17:20 +0200
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: "Scott Fluhrer(sfluhrer)" <sfluhrer@cisco.com>, ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, stenn@nwtime.org
References: <1a0e9a0d48104183b336422529790c43@XCH-RTP-006.cisco.com> <9628002d-3917-684a-5f83-58b0ca62dd69@nwtime.org>
In-Reply-To: <9628002d-3917-684a-5f83-58b0ca62dd69@nwtime.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 194.94.155.52
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: [ntpwg] Antw: Re: Comments on draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-08
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>

>>> Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org> schrieb am 04.05.2017 um 00:47 in Nachricht
<9628002d-3917-684a-5f83-58b0ca62dd69@nwtime.org>:


[...]
> - encryption is of dubious value in a LAN setting.
[...]

I'd say "encryption may not be needed or wanted in some LAN environments"

Regards,
Ulrich


_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg