[Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Draft agenda and date for NTP wg virtual interim.
Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Tue, 31 March 2020 06:04 UTC
Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEE53A0D38 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q47ZgsVP1rDo for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.uni-regensburg.de (mx1.uni-regensburg.de [IPv6:2001:638:a05:137:165:0:3:bdf7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 766B53A1C3A for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id B14AC600004F for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:03:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by mx1.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E8C600004E for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:03:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:03:34 +0200
Message-Id: <5E82DD34020000A100038049@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.2.1
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:03:32 +0200
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, mlichvar@redhat.com
Cc: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
References: <082870370200000B6A6A8CFC@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <4EC7D68E020000F243047E14@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <4EC7D68E020000F243047E14@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/BHqfGoYvD0VLCemtBouFsefQySs>
Subject: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Draft agenda and date for NTP wg virtual interim.
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 06:04:01 -0000
>>> Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> schrieb am 30.03.2020 um 11:11 in Nachricht <25678_1585559523_5E81B7E3_25678_473_1_20200330091137.98345406061@ip-64-139-1-69 sjc.megapath.net>: > mlichvar@redhat.com said: >> NTS works poorly if there is a large packet loss. Too many NTS‑KE requests. > > Are packet losses statistical or reproducible? I never tried, but I think with Linux and iptables you can defines rules that simulate packet drops. Maybe a scenario to use for testing the protocol... > > I'd expect that routes change infrequently and that a particular route > either > works or doesn't. So "poorly" doesn't quite fit. > > ‑‑ > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > > > _______________________________________________ > ntp mailing list > ntp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
- [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: Draft agenda and date for N… Ulrich Windl