IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ntp] Errata RFC5905 (6501)

David Venhoek <david@venhoek.nl> Tue, 30 August 2022 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <david@venhoek.nl>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C8AC1524BB for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:27:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=venhoek-nl.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZBZz7Fkf8tzk for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1132.google.com (mail-yw1-x1132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81088C1522A8 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1132.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-3413ad0640dso132949027b3.13 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=venhoek-nl.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=gsLz92VugnCj5X9RthuNWsKeraGxTQPKFRL0p4l20tY=; b=hhwsgF5G7deyeBBy1uhDYnsFKSWVOIuXkuIUrQzR/dXGGzxI100X32T1Avkcc/64So HoKATxuuKqlMEgmBX3fJj0dSWGpiLzylyF6Zac5QTmR5JBm1HoCFS+HIYT8PVBT6+epl pPvszNzcYlDeRaimXMj+M03U1JkYMfpJOs7QLaiHfUoHKrTuVH+F3hrgpWUXFTIBcPKp n9RJCP+rQL3p5WPnpN8OyQw7PZfiOF0RUrhQpKHhqylYFfBBaSRak3JfkE2CIh/45mLT 5XlfEo2VjcxPP7GMl2TV0c43O1woXYu2Aoqa/ecvX01MWnJUBZCdVPZY4qLG5viITsJZ gICA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc; bh=gsLz92VugnCj5X9RthuNWsKeraGxTQPKFRL0p4l20tY=; b=TVW6tY4DcsJfcdtcaNs8j7tenY1FcpcnB3rzKJq7SSMxdBmKfMzhP2XqWv7Nyv8gYU 2Y8X/0BF9zCOkdfP3ao9me/Qp8/h+fjm8WYszdhF6n8/yCHYC10u5+XS3Y1pCg0FBuC2 sQV2HOJdeNE9fwoakc+AWz/sn+giTGmeluJ/Q0tQXrQBLHVJHLhaN55MO0O6Q9kCNwzA FcE1UGjzDLaclJrcg0+yh0dXPx0y2opXowQJhxMiJekOwiTAXy1XUKmnyF/Yf4056hfi MaD/QLI9u8Bah+l7tas9n9m1/Cf+0nv82vmXrH1gdBLcrICMWsKlNkTq9qpz/VTShCrZ iUfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1GqO6M8aqQFAQKD8E2w+oe9ScnzOQax+TcFh6LzWQewmyMBKbn X8KreBgBeDyfc2d5b6VooRjc5EPR5DwBi3ELDYuq2x69bhZaWNUj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5xxR/i8etg97/fs3FB1iC5wHmnvg70mKTxUw1ijo5Twin+zemgEH3fNp8p52fzLQaswvHb0ErbGrLiV1ubWCE=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:38d5:0:b0:32f:e74:6dd0 with SMTP id f204-20020a8138d5000000b0032f0e746dd0mr15373347ywa.22.1661887623781; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 12:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: David Venhoek <david@venhoek.nl>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:26:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPz_-SXR42UJeYuWxiQT1=5KYwUoYA4c2JtKHG6bpzMentifyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: ntp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/CHcBo-my1WdRg5PbhSU8aFlIS_k>
Subject: [Ntp] Errata RFC5905 (6501)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 19:27:09 -0000

Dear All, Erik

Went over errata report 5601
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5601). From my best
understanding, the reported section with is indeed erroneous, and s.t
should be replaced with c.t, defined in section 9.1/12. The attached
note seems inaccurate in the statement that a new name (t_s) is
needed, since c.t covers the required concept. This also renders the
additional inserted sentence non-necessary.

Kind regards,
David Venhoek

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email