[Ntp] NTS draft updates for hackathon
Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> Thu, 28 March 2019 21:50 UTC
Return-Path: <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37961203B4 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eESagwsYwI1f for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com (mail-qk1-x72b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36B3D1204E4 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id o129so202899qke.8 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=HF66yxIsWifoKKbkiKScBb6gUeFeUwttocA9A8Oftk8=; b=n6dZ7IpXIgQOwHED23oemhZB+ErXtfRRRe1HnKvQ7UK8Uu4q1mhAyc34Zsu7L7I+0K 8AXmR0QkaKy8eD+x63jmf5u2pJh7xDMEbHXF4T/EMuxRwNNEanUvnOiBHW8qvFDrvCH1 4JnsqbOaMLCbfgp30O4eT91K99udP9mIHE0roLn9eu3ENn4kRGox2bgsvX+TGyApJH77 YIZHDc0Y8/6GquP0wufjSMWUBeOZz9wmMnWpxmZvRTf3JpHenPXJQaXXDYJNtp+TnWnE 6iQicOkcrdPCWbtJXurIvELuXC3ZdtiPtn6ITwJ1WNEjoVff+sZEkjYHr40LLdE3NYqB gFxw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=HF66yxIsWifoKKbkiKScBb6gUeFeUwttocA9A8Oftk8=; b=Qbpd8Q+V993LIpEvCymysU4AWEI8QuKsKcZCHxdO+YQO2Yz+8PfaXjnZ4ICogiXySm st2EsMv68V5hrzLP0Plm4YcoCJsH0rwkf6bgQrKX/4H4o/y/lVIGCypUati4i63P98MK leZnAnQgdu1ylG2zVpii1Kn98RV/V277I0WLsFRKkm/1ciYzC/n1p/LZdxyVF2/Nf99+ Y1Czcbi9glbVaxnqDKhm+Zc8XPHJkVUUfdjhACj2dJui/EhBaonaLbY31KrMA727lvky Ke8W0RqC+t6RzDqWYB93//L02SXupoIbLuN54BBz7jxWjcsFTioc4a60l8ZELJsU6KG+ IHsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWW15xeoucGl868Yud6ryy1DLmu1OCkkYl1KKHWfWF4Y1BKyld6 ox8dgEHJ5QRPVcOvaCq7ArLApz8ejb+2H6fTBIvVX/NM
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzH+8bHdvB3utKholTXI9c+erq/IYpuEn2I1EAMWUrTe27EtrvDf4L3j3zr//3yaD8MrqxAc8Ha3QUG7cyE3Wo=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:61d0:: with SMTP id v199mr36933882qkb.159.1553809837901; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 22:50:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJm83bAU=LXVkDa6hXUVMv0scF-4jK53cuUQ=KvqRfR82=a7kg@mail.gmail.com>
To: ntp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/CLLlxbfgY8hQkuVz3Iv5aoxj_3Y>
Subject: [Ntp] NTS draft updates for hackathon
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 21:50:48 -0000
I've pushed a draft 18 to the NTS git repo containing all the updates discussed at and since Tuesday's WG meeting. However, the Implementation Status section ought to be updated to reflect this week's hackathon. Can someone who participated please contribute the text for this? Let's just drop my the text about my PoC implementation from the first hackathon, since it's not up-to-date with the latest draft, and I don't think listing five implementations is significantly more persuasive than listing four.
- [Ntp] NTS draft updates for hackathon Daniel Franke