Re: [Ntp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5906 (6402)

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Thu, 21 January 2021 12:27 UTC

To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, mills@udel.edu, ek.ietf@gmail.com, evyncke@cisco.com, dsibold.ietf@gmail.com, odonoghue@isoc.org
Cc: housley@vigilsec.com, ntp@ietf.org
References: <20210120225421.1FCBEF4075A@rfc-editor.org>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <a128c793-8b63-c7bf-56e4-6264a8ed8853@innovationslab.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:27:15 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210120225421.1FCBEF4075A@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/DzjsA8r_S0ofvw9dBuDX-nSkUJs>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5906 (6402)
Precedence: list

I agree with Russ' correction.

Brian

On 1/20/21 5:54 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5906,
> "Network Time Protocol Version 4: Autokey Specification".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6402
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
> 
> Section: Appendix J
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    CertificateSerialNumber
>    SET { ::= INTEGER
>            Validity ::= SEQUENCE {
>                    notBefore              UTCTime,
>                    notAfter               UTCTime
>            }
>    }
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    CertificateSerialNumber ::= INTEGER
> 
>    Validity ::= SEQUENCE {
>                    notBefore              UTCTime,
>                    notAfter               UTCTime
>    }
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The original ASN.1 will not compile.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5906 (draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-08)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Network Time Protocol Version 4: Autokey Specification
> Publication Date    : June 2010
> Author(s)           : B. Haberman, Ed., D. Mills
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Network Time Protocol
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

[Ntp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5906 (6402) RFC Errata System
Re: [Ntp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5906 (64… Brian Haberman