[ntpwg] (no subject)

"Odonoghue, Karen F CIV NSWCDD, W13" <karen.odonoghue@navy.mil> Wed, 24 October 2007 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <karen.odonoghue@navy.mil>
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.isc.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.isc.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4A939DBF for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.isc.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karen.odonoghue@navy.mil)
Received: from mail1.ntp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ntp1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 34430-01 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.isc.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:21:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail2.ntp.org (mail2.ntp.org [204.152.184.138]) by mail1.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.isc.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:21:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karen.odonoghue@navy.mil)
Received: from gate2-norfolk.nmci.navy.mil (gate2-norfolk.nmci.navy.mil [138.162.0.42]) by mail2.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0960F398E1 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.isc.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:20:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karen.odonoghue@navy.mil)
Received: from NAEANRFKEG05.nadsusea.nads.navy.mil ([10.16.0.163]) by gate2-norfolk.nmci.navy.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6872); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:25:22 -0400
Received: from NAEANRFKEB08.nadsusea.nads.navy.mil ([10.16.20.173]) by NAEANRFKEG05.nadsusea.nads.navy.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:13:26 -0400
Received: from naeamilleb03.nadsusea.nads.navy.mil ([10.18.183.100]) by NAEANRFKEB08.nadsusea.nads.navy.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:13:26 -0400
Received: from NAEAMILLEX01VA.nadsusea.nads.navy.mil ([10.18.183.23]) by naeamilleb03.nadsusea.nads.navy.mil with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:13:19 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C81658.CAF2A9E0"
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:13:17 -0500
Message-ID: <2E44C2268B59514C89AE2CB514D15ACA08F3D425@NAEAMILLEX01VA.nadsusea.nads.navy.mil>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Index: AcgWWMkz0C97r6wcQLiRXsLGMxmIvw==
From: "Odonoghue, Karen F CIV NSWCDD, W13" <karen.odonoghue@navy.mil>
To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.isc.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2007 16:13:19.0959 (UTC) FILETIME=[CB0C8E70:01C81658]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on ntp1.isc.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40, HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY, NO_RDNS2, TW_TP
X-Spam-Level: *
Subject: [ntpwg] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:22:07 -0000

Folks,

Some reminders and status info regarding ntp wg efforts...

The current draft of the ntp protocol specification is available at: 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-07.txt
Jim Martin is working on an update based on the WG Last Call and the
last meeting. 

The current draft of the mib specification is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-mib-02.txt
Chris Elliott is working on an update. 

There is a new draft for autokey available at:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ntp-autokey-00.txt
We need review and comment. 

Additionally, as you are no doubt aware, there has been some
conversation on the list recently about next generation activities. I
would encourage you to read the following documents and participate in
the tictoc discussions. The IETF is actively trying to decide how to
move forward. There may be another TICTOC BOF scheduled for the next
IETF meeting. 

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bryant-tictoc-probstat-01.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stein-tictoc-modules-00.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-frost-packet-timing-framework-
00.txt

Karen