[Ntp] What happened to draft-ietf-ntp-data-minimization?
Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Tue, 09 February 2021 12:42 UTC
Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218CB3A1A4A for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 04:42:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.036
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LIU4mezlyUj0 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 04:42:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3DD3A16F2 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 04:42:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78259406061; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 04:42:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: ntp@ietf.org
cc: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 04:42:21 -0800
Message-Id: <20210209124221.78259406061@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/GLJzQnXnnztCqHAIuLYa11ICcOo>
Subject: [Ntp] What happened to draft-ietf-ntp-data-minimization?
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 12:42:23 -0000
Draft 04 from Mar 2019 has expired. I thought it was well done. Did it expire because people lost interest? If so, should we add data-minimization to the NTPv5 list? Section 5.1 in RFC 8633, BCP, July 2019, is on Minimizing Information Leakage Were people expecting the BCP to pick up the ideas from the data-minimization draft? Has anybody gone through to see how many ideas from the data-minimization draft did/didn't make it into the BCP? I just happened to be interested in the transmit timestamp. I can't find any mention of transmit timestamp randomization in the BCP. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.