[Ntp] NTS Draft - nits
Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Wed, 27 March 2019 09:35 UTC
Return-Path: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704CA12028F for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 02:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.033
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uwSjClwWSRhq for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5964712027B for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 02:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E399F406061; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 02:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: ntp@ietf.org
cc: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 02:35:26 -0700
Message-Id: <20190327093526.E399F406061@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/KejGsOOCTDEPrXWpdPcugMAJLs4>
Subject: [Ntp] NTS Draft - nits
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 09:35:29 -0000
The top of page 8 says: > servers MUST accept requests of at least 1024 octets and > clients SHOULD accept responses of at least 65536 octets. 1K seems reasonable. 65K seems unreasonably large. Cookies are ballpark of 100 bytes, maybe closer to 200 if you use AES_SIV_CMAC_512. 8*200 fits in 2K. Do we want to specify a max length for the Server Negotiation? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.
- [Ntp] NTS Draft - nits Hal Murray
- [Ntp] Antw: NTS Draft - nits Ulrich Windl