IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ntp] BCP 195

Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> Tue, 28 August 2018 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72600130EE5 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z61q9_ej5Ld8 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22c.google.com (mail-qt0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9642130EAC for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id n6-v6so2691596qtl.4 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mY8FO3fRmyYAZUGymw4Z7c0pk2Kaf/m7y4fvzicML3I=; b=fKhlcf6b5ZXzLUMGY6wQN0E5LfVTYxL6b0CppLL99VS1DwzyyQ0hjRVLP5M4C8/Ae4 09tMg4sd77jm+kbDd3mwCvQsaQ+zi4OTvUX55AgqMVB6Q6H5qJpmO0ump4trMxmvX+Iw F/YfwToHzVUDXyk9YS9gtIDataiLg8QEfQsfWKxPUIZj9H5ewauK1i2JQ77+80K3vLKK ivVVKCneS52OCjDthXy2k6SXgJVPxQ/AtTzg5yPZAVFHiw1rVTfXCQKjs3O5u5Og7Xlb 4tJ8iLz72RegczVwwy9g16IuoHTeRj8a/4VcvEJMBHBHYF21jhRd2UOdpZ96+/p/djNZ s/oA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mY8FO3fRmyYAZUGymw4Z7c0pk2Kaf/m7y4fvzicML3I=; b=CACV4RYbhCY9jgDHL05s41IOnApxl5WrnTquDUNJVmbxtKewoSA4jOxXIGZ7yK9OVY 5zNgJ0YczLBH3R7GbrzwlNxjQLcCOhL56TWq+fAKj2U7HRSCSyruDl2ITO6Yt4KC5ra4 9sI7PQDpFZtYX6KQmfynQahJkq37MFkUIUnp+VXT+J8/TvGcJfQQUUIQeA3yzimUPsGo GKXkhU/+eWFvgmPVqGeFTZDptQ0KPbEEKzjC/h2cAR89AINC1wVVsBis00d+FHRxooNn 2t5NY6ohWq6q/EMCTxyg7/cXUR9kNO/QZcvuqzIPA6qbs2hIEyz0pJPp7x3IjKSSFH1L F7sA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CiL3RD0QiAJdd/T/GtEnKmkeSHI2LVIPK8emhiSc9tjsAzSrM1 iPurBp1mHQIjIW14q7QlungWV2mD7lvBo61Vl5iP7KK7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYKU4CCenR3VmEDq4VHe7LUU3pIQAnHc2ZqBQEKQOMv/VlQWiQJqPvr6Mt4btDkM8+IGyQ99MZAyaG9Q9/IAOU=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:21c6:: with SMTP id 6-v6mr2860514qtz.171.1535478421815; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 13:46:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJm83bBsmKB14-dXGFXRMHXMOtwfogqDe8Vz54dJKOAL1N24NA@mail.gmail.com>
To: ntp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/SnwtFCB-ZB4Uy0WGNX9_SQMbgfU>
Subject: [Ntp] BCP 195
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 17:47:17 -0000

I just learned (by reading draft-moriarty-tls-oldversions-diediedie)
that BCP 195 exists, which gives best current practices for secure use
of TLS. I'm going to rewrite the "TLS Profile for Network Time
Security" as primarily a mandate to comply with that BCP. It'll go on
to turn a couple of its SHOULDs into MUSTs where the BCP makes more
allowances for legacy compatibility than we need to.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email