IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] ntp-over-ptp concerns

Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Wed, 13 March 2024 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mlichvar@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D22FC14F5FF for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fnaqzFwPP6dS for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9527CC14F60C for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 07:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1710341484; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sU/jBAazR0psZqEiZ1Fo+kMT1TIlfkwbLkYwiumhRTA=; b=ZzRkFJZgjAl4M1+YE/UYA/oU/JqW7lUwkBx5N2AzDWTP6CD/oAZ+7rs+UWl0cMCBVomwuI jhStfzwAFWcABJ6pdLS8ZqrO1qDRCYzgQWfnArt0rI0M5SdERqjs7TwQy/KXP9npJ42lDo LYntPzGq7lERHX2Krqd4wnXP6ajT6VI=
Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-522-s5C10OXMP1STNX8Vvo_XIg-1; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:51:21 -0400
X-MC-Unique: s5C10OXMP1STNX8Vvo_XIg-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D715E81A267; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:51:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.43.135.229]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F4BE1C060D1; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:51:20 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:51:19 +0100
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: Doug Arnold <doug.arnold=40meinberg-usa.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Rodney Cummings <rodney.cummings@keysight.com>, NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <ZfG9Z70isj-QXdQ_@localhost>
References: <DM6PR17MB3484BA12E5E0214094779270832B2@DM6PR17MB3484.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> <AM7PR02MB57656DD84240E26C98BAFC95CF2A2@AM7PR02MB5765.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AM7PR02MB57656DD84240E26C98BAFC95CF2A2@AM7PR02MB5765.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/XSraDDP9f7fGdrTKX0zFANmuQpQ>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] ntp-over-ptp concerns
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:51:26 -0000

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 01:45:02PM +0000, Doug Arnold wrote:
> In principle, one will be able to do with CSPTP what one can do with NTP.

Ok, so CSPTP is reinventing NTP from scratch? Was this effort prompted
by the SPTP announced by Facebook recently? Why not simply adopt NTP
instead? If anything is missing we can specify extension fields.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email