IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ntp] Drafts on interleaved modes and correction field

Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Tue, 31 October 2017 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <mlichvar@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A45D13F6F5 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 02:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XnjNPZeDzB_U for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 02:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE37813F6F1 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 02:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4279480C1B; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 09:01:42 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 4279480C1B
Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=mlichvar@redhat.com
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.43.2.117]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8794A5D969; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 09:01:41 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:01:39 +0100
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: ntp@ietf.org
Cc: Aanchal Malhotra <aanchal4@bu.edu>
Message-ID: <20171031090139.GD15597@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Tue, 31 Oct 2017 09:01:42 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/_5xmp59U7WYji-LRAqlVidSR7tI>
Subject: [Ntp] Drafts on interleaved modes and correction field
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 09:01:45 -0000

Hi,

there are two new drafts intended for the NTP working group.

Aanchal and I have been working on a draft that would specify the
interleaved modes which are supported in some NTP implementations.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mlichvar-ntp-interleaved-modes-00

The second draft describes the PTP-like correction field that I
proposed on this list a couple times, but it never had a more detailed
specification.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mlichvar-ntp-correction-field-00

Comments and suggestions are welcome.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email