[Ntp] [Errata Rejected] RFC5905 (5020)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 29 August 2022 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED077C15DD47; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:39:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.66
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.66 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.998, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4m-PCz1470hO; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADB4CC13C20A; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 75BE36AAEB; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: wferi@niif.hu, mills@udel.edu, jrmii@isc.org, jack.burbank@jhuapl.edu, william.kasch@jhuapl.edu
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ek.ietf@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, ntp@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220829223908.75BE36AAEB@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 15:39:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/_8rrfe-Wa4IYRT7-GEvNOGWZWis>
Subject: [Ntp] [Errata Rejected] RFC5905 (5020)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 22:39:13 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC5905,
"Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5020

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported by: Ferenc Wágner <wferi@niif.hu>
Date Reported: 2017-05-15
Rejected by: Erik Kline (IESG)

Section: 8

Original Text
-------------
theta = T(B) - T(A) = 1/2 * [(T2-T1) + (T3-T4)]

Corrected Text
--------------
theta = T(B) - T(A) = 1/2 * [(T2-T1) + (T4-T3)]

Notes
-----
The corresponding code line in A.5.1.1. agrees with this correction:

offset = (LFP2D(r->rec - r->org) + LFP2D(r->dst - r->xmt)) / 2;

taking Figure 7 into account:

| org       | T1         | origin timestamp      |
| rec       | T2         | receive timestamp     |
| xmt       | T3         | transmit timestamp    |
| dst       | T4         | destination timestamp |
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
As noted this thread:

    https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/AR7k0IP2PMgXdq2bknx6Eiz4upE/

'''
Theta is "the offset of B relative to A". The proposed revision is

   1/2 * [(T2-T1) + (T4-T3)]

Example: Let's assume that B and A are exactly synced to UTC and that the
network delay is 50msec in each direction.

    T2-T1 is the NTP mode 3 request delay (including network delay).

This gives 50 msec
    T4-T3 is the NTP mode 4 response delay (including network delay).

This gives 50 msec.

The proposed revision gives 100msec/2 = RTT/2, not the expected offset of
zero.

The RFC5905 formula seems correct.

    theta = T(B) - T(A) = 1/2 * [(T2-T1) + (T3-T4)]

but might have been clearer had it been written:

    theta = T(B) - T(A) = 1/2 * [(T2-T1) - (T4-T3)]
'''

--------------------------------------
RFC5905 (draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification
Publication Date    : June 2010
Author(s)           : D. Mills, J. Martin, Ed., J. Burbank, W. Kasch
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network Time Protocols
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG