[ntpwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-07.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu, 10 March 2016 14:58 UTC
Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D189512D9DC for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:58:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nwp5gtKvdueM for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:58:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D701B12DA7B for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:49:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8D186DBED for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947EF86DBC9 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:49:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <internet-drafts@ietf.org>) id 1ae1tz-000Mwz-W0 for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:49:32 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D7112D927; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:49:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.16.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160310144922.29026.6361.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 06:49:22 -0800
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 4.31.198.44
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: [ntpwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-07.txt
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Time Protocol of the IETF.
Title : UDP Checksum Complement in the Network Time Protocol (NTP)
Author : Tal Mizrahi
Filename : draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-07.txt
Pages : 13
Date : 2016-03-10
Abstract:
The Network Time Protocol (NTP) allows clients to synchronize to a
time server using timestamped protocol messages. To facilitate
accurate timestamping, some implementations use hardware-based
timestamping engines that integrate the accurate transmission time
into every outgoing NTP packet during transmission. Since these
packets are transported over UDP, the UDP checksum field is then
updated to reflect this modification. This document proposes an
extension field that includes a 2-octet Checksum Complement, allowing
timestamping engines to reflect the checksum modification in the last
2 octets of the packet rather than in the UDP checksum field. The
behavior defined in this document is interoperable with existing NTP
implementations.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-07
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trailer-07
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg
- [ntpwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-checksum-trail… internet-drafts