Re: [Ntp] Frequency transfer in NTP

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Sun, 31 January 2021 23:11 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F923A1307 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 15:11:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oH2J1LL2HpFI for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 15:11:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 478293A1304 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 15:11:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id p20so2108600ejb.6 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 15:11:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QQ1KXA6VTZmnLTLtMXIKF8qzHft5W6VhlO4ZhubaAQk=; b=fvIMNAADng7ZkenxRXPXkqNuwz3gGsYI8WgQI4D13FEcszlDpF8FY0aLbJmQ98qYDw OkcHY2xl68u7rIVuDtGbqBaQg9ePs/eh0/6wIykxd+/esfhuET6ap8XcBuyWDcuKStar NYgZhycG1+I0hOVww/NMoi0dPDwQwfCn7F8SUklbD5QoIumDiJJfEI3tuAWWCkQN4jyM bbTTCMu8zseBjS/YRVEgi9c0wf2+bFkrvW0MJxQqN/905zbwqap5VvOG0Ch8w2nV3qbN LErkntYEFbeK69G7RhAZ7RhjuSJEvf3Htyfg5mxPAIMlYV59lmr9TKKknkWcesmWXJvc ZCyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QQ1KXA6VTZmnLTLtMXIKF8qzHft5W6VhlO4ZhubaAQk=; b=mh9tSkuTeRU+CFZVy/epB+jKxJ+cv8OTZUiZ8KEfp0X7oVMpBOLmVwIGi9cySWKDjH jXtuzFaftMW21TORCVKT3369xLKQ6yN6XZ1QGyXg7Sy1k/B2rI1c78sxstAfD38rRw+Q Ov7JmVq3EYRrPpZX82fcuoS1/gD4X/ta9B38eaVPrP0TN3afPdNdIWeiMLtUAf9WNU1G GfrY8dIvp75uVZjYYxYqMKgZ905T6iwDW1CFF627gR+ug48HPjefkIwzMkjhwqwYp7YK OKuQOpKN7W2EL4sfPvDMMGK5mArRY3xO2HHf927dflAachmCSLVdN1dr8dmqMTmLZ6wT NbuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532KOh+JbHSTuMC0dZzwX5yC6LVfM+5bt8dRomvNurRnWTOu802e RQ5Saz6/SXt+vXYdAeTIHuSZFE/nZvoY3Whh/Z0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9fxzhvt4zRHnSmOUW4W/eUlwoOzmgF4GNur/nMfH/UK+tn/aFfYJ0k6pcAMO+ZU2QcmcZSQFrMKtN9RwQhEo=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3a13:: with SMTP id z19mr15541155eje.317.1612134658227; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 15:10:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210128143137.GA1205378@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20210128143137.GA1205378@localhost>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 15:10:46 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0cmZtqiYKhhM2Mxz5-POkU5y=KVmb-t=7ngsCzzX5mF1YA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Cc: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/gDr9IMFbQ_xuPr0QY4yGgucwRxM>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Frequency transfer in NTP
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 23:11:02 -0000

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:32 AM Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> One of the new features that was proposed for NTPv5 is an additional
> receive timestamp to enable a frequency transfer to stabilize
> synchronization. I have tested this idea with two different
> implementations:
>
> https://fedorapeople.org/~mlichvar/ntp-freq-transfer/

Thank you Miroslav for conducting these necessary experiments!

One thing to note is independent operation of a frequency reference is
easier than independent operation of a time reference: it has to know
what time it was started.

Sincerely,
Watson Ladd

>
> I think this would be a significant improvement of the protocol.
>
> --
> Miroslav Lichvar
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list
> ntp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp



--
Astra mortemque praestare gradatim