[Ntp] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC5905 (6524)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 26 September 2022 00:27 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A500C14F722; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8T_6uH13y-SM; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9083C14F6EB; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 9F5F54C956; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: kenduffill@gmail.com, mills@udel.edu, jrmii@isc.org, jack.burbank@jhuapl.edu, william.kasch@jhuapl.edu
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ek.ietf@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, ntp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220926002735.9F5F54C956@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:27:35 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/ho0C1uAI60CBTrIjRdyVT-5THG0>
Subject: [Ntp] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC5905 (6524)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:27:40 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC5905, "Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6524 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: Kenneth Duffill <kenduffill@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2021-04-09 Held by: Erik Kline (IESG) Section: 6 Original Text ------------- 202,939,144 Corrected Text -------------- 202,934,144 Notes ----- In Figure 4 The Era Offset of 1 Jan 1 has a typo. The value of 202,939,144 for the Era Offset of 1 Jan 1 should be 202,934,144 because 1 Jan 0 has an Era Offset of 171,311,744 and there are 366 days in year 0, therefore the Era Offset for 1 Jan 1 should be 86400 * 366 (= 31,622,400) greater than that for 1 JAN 0. --- [INT AD notes] >From https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/Cbg3sOhChyfenYoj7UG5wCymFMU/ : """ ... might be correct too, but I find that table confusing with those dates when the modern definition of the second and UTC didn't exist yet... """ -------------------------------------- RFC5905 (draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-13) -------------------------------------- Title : Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification Publication Date : June 2010 Author(s) : D. Mills, J. Martin, Ed., J. Burbank, W. Kasch Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Time Protocols Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Ntp] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC5905 (… RFC Errata System