[Ntp] [Errata Verified] RFC5905 (4504)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 27 July 2022 15:02 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C981C14F73A; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 08:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o3AxU7xTjMX2; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 08:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9154BC14F719; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 08:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id C7B1B6AA26; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 08:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: mlichvar@redhat.com, mills@udel.edu, jrmii@isc.org, jack.burbank@jhuapl.edu, william.kasch@jhuapl.edu
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ek.ietf@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, ntp@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220727150231.C7B1B6AA26@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 08:02:31 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/ldP0LVIP9o1SVQWugpAfja7mjlY>
Subject: [Ntp] [Errata Verified] RFC5905 (4504)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 15:02:43 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC5905, "Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4504 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> Date Reported: 2015-10-15 Verified by: Erik Kline (IESG) Section: 7.3 Original Text ------------- LI Leap Indicator (leap): 2-bit integer warning of an impending leap second to be inserted or deleted in the last minute of the current month with values defined in Figure 9. +-------+----------------------------------------+ | Value | Meaning | +-------+----------------------------------------+ | 0 | no warning | | 1 | last minute of the day has 61 seconds | | 2 | last minute of the day has 59 seconds | Corrected Text -------------- LI Leap Indicator (leap): 2-bit integer warning of an impending leap second to be inserted or deleted in the last minute of the current day with values defined in Figure 9. +-------+----------------------------------------+ | Value | Meaning | +-------+----------------------------------------+ | 0 | no warning | | 1 | last minute of the day has 61 seconds | | 2 | last minute of the day has 59 seconds | Notes ----- There is an inconsistency (day vs month) between the LI description and the description of values in the Figure 9. Few paragraphs before that text there is: Except for a minor variation when using the IPv6 address family, these fields are backwards compatible with NTPv3. If it was month instead of day it would not be compatible with RFC 1305 (NTPv3) and RFC 4330 (SNTPv4), which were obsoleted by RFC 5905. -------------------------------------- RFC5905 (draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-13) -------------------------------------- Title : Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification Publication Date : June 2010 Author(s) : D. Mills, J. Martin, Ed., J. Burbank, W. Kasch Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Time Protocols Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Ntp] [Errata Verified] RFC5905 (4504) RFC Errata System