[Ntp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5905 (6550)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 28 July 2022 14:49 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CC7C138FA2 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.964
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.964 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH=0.998, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pAumk_Hoj30b for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3239AC16ECC5 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 0B2E9E5349; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:49:50 -0700 (PDT)
To: mills@udel.edu, jrmii@isc.org, jack.burbank@jhuapl.edu, william.kasch@jhuapl.edu, ek.ietf@gmail.com, evyncke@cisco.com, odonoghue@isoc.org, dsibold.ietf@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: wferi@niif.hu, ntp@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220728144950.0B2E9E5349@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:49:50 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/vIERt2x7oZimt5pwKfXUMzcRucQ>
Subject: [Ntp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5905 (6550)
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 14:49:54 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5905, "Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6550 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Ferenc Wágner <wferi@niif.hu> Section: 8 Original Text ------------- theta = T(B) - T(A) = 1/2 * [(T2-T1) + (T3-T4)] Corrected Text -------------- theta = T(B) - T(A) = 1/2 * [(T2-T1) + (T4-T3)] Notes ----- The corresponding code line in A.5.1.1. agrees with this correction: offset = (LFP2D(r->rec - r->org) + LFP2D(r->dst - r->xmt)) / 2; taking Figure 7 into account: | org | T1 | origin timestamp | | rec | T2 | receive timestamp | | xmt | T3 | transmit timestamp | | dst | T4 | destination timestamp | Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5905 (draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-13) -------------------------------------- Title : Network Time Protocol Version 4: Protocol and Algorithms Specification Publication Date : June 2010 Author(s) : D. Mills, J. Martin, Ed., J. Burbank, W. Kasch Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Time Protocols Area : Internet Stream : IETF
- [Ntp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5905 (6550) RFC Errata System