[ntpwg] New draft proposals
Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org> Tue, 15 March 2016 08:05 UTC
Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB2C12D94A for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lNbQE5yuPbuJ for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3293C12D8DF for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEA186DBD0 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:05:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4110086DBA3 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:04:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from chessie.everett.org ([2001:470:1:205::234]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <stenn@nwtime.org>) id 1afjy7-000G1W-EI for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:04:50 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chessie.everett.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21B10B82A for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:04:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hms-mbp11.pfcs.com (96-41-177-107.dhcp.mdfd.or.charter.com [96.41.177.107]) by chessie.everett.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA19DB80E; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:04:42 +0000 (UTC)
To: "ntpwg@lists.ntp.org" <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
From: Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>
Message-ID: <56E7C280.70009@nwtime.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:06:24 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent
X-DSPAM-Processed: Tue Mar 15 08:04:42 2016
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899
X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000
X-DSPAM-Signature: 6384,56e7c21a829931182510160
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1:205::234
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stenn@nwtime.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: [ntpwg] New draft proposals
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
Folks, I've submitted some proposals: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stenn-ntp-i-do/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stenn-ntp-ipv6-refid-hash/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stenn-ntp-last-extension/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stenn-ntp-leap-smear-refid/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stenn-ntp-suggest-refid/ The first, "I-Do", is a way for one ntpd instance to say "I support the following extension fields, what EFs to you support?". The "IPv6 REFID hash" is a way to specify an IPv6-based refid in a way that does not collide with usable IPv4-based refids. The "Last Extension" proposal is a way to say "I'm the last Extension Field. What comes next is a legacy MAC." The "Leap Smear REFID" codifies what the reference implementation currently does if leap-smear support is enabled and >actively processing a leap smear<. The "Suggest REFID" proposal is a mechanism for system A to offer a nonce to system B to be used as B's refid in the case where B decides A is its system peer. -- Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org> http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member! _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg
- [ntpwg] New draft proposals Harlan Stenn