[ntpwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-refid-updates-00.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Sun, 13 November 2016 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB291295F6 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 13:38:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8S06Nk7DCLaX for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 13:38:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (psp3.ntp.org [185.140.48.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB3D129421 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 13:38:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [10.224.90.243]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF7586DB1B for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:38:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (fortinet.ntp.org [10.224.90.254]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA2B86D48C for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:37:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <internet-drafts@ietf.org>) id 1c62Sv-000FjK-Rw for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 21:37:37 +0000
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC712129458; Sun, 13 Nov 2016 13:37:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.37.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147907304889.5509.16183295779122587670.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 13:37:28 -0800
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 4.31.198.44
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: [ntpwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ntp-refid-updates-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Time Protocol of the IETF.

        Title           : Network Time Protocol REFID Updates
        Authors         : Harlan Stenn
                          Sharon Goldberg
	Filename        : draft-ietf-ntp-refid-updates-00.txt
	Pages           : 10
	Date            : 2016-11-13

Abstract:
   RFC 5905 [RFC5905], section 7.3, "Packet Header Variables", defines
   the value of the REFID, the system peer for the responding host.  In
   the past, for IPv4 associations the IPv4 address is used, and for
   IPv6 associations the first four octets of the MD5 hash of the IPv6
   are used.  There are at least three shortcomings to this approach,
   and this proposal will address the three so noted.  One is that
   knowledge of the system peer is "abusable" information and should not
   be generally available.  The second is that the four octet hash of
   the IPv6 address looks very much like an IPv4 address, and this is
   confusing.  The third is that a growing number of low-stratum servers
   want to offer leap-smeared time to their clients, and there is no
   obvious way to know if a server is offering accurate time or leap-
   smeared time.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-refid-updates/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ntp-refid-updates-00


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg