[ntpwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5908 (3624)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 16 May 2013 12:14 UTC
Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9793021F9227 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 05:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.343
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.343 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.256, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jb10QvI88oaT for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 05:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BD121F8EC6 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 05:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC88886DAAF for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 12:14:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8AC86D333 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 12:13:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([2001:1890:126c::1:2f]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>) id 1Ucx48-000Ies-RT for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Thu, 16 May 2013 12:13:50 +0000
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 13ED562103; Thu, 16 May 2013 05:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
To: richard.gayraud@free.fr, blourdel@cisco.com, brian@innovationslab.net, ted.lemon@nominum.com, odonoghue@isoc.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20130516121332.13ED562103@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 05:13:32 -0700
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:1890:126c::1:2f
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wwwrun@rfc-editor.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Cc: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, fx.lebail@yahoo.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [ntpwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5908 (3624)
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5908, "Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5908&eid=3624 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Francois-Xavier Le Bail <fx.lebail@yahoo.com> Section: 4 Original Text ------------- [...] The currently defined time source suboptions are NTP_OPTION_SRV_ADDR, NTP_OPTION_SRV_MC_ADDR, and NTP_OPTION_SRV_FQDN. [...] Corrected Text -------------- [...] The currently defined time source suboptions are NTP_SUBOPTION_SRV_ADDR, NTP_SUBOPTION_MC_ADDR, and NTP_SUBOPTION_SRV_FQDN. [...] Notes ----- It does not appear clearly if the type of error must be technical or editorial. The three suboptions are defined in the sections 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3. Their names are differents of those used in second paragraph of the section 4. Iana standardized the 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 names. see: http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters/bootp-dhcp-parameters.xml [...] Value Name Reference 1 NTP_SUBOPTION_SRV_ADDR [RFC5908] 2 NTP_SUBOPTION_MC_ADDR [RFC5908] 3 NTP_SUBOPTION_SRV_FQDN [RFC5908] [...] Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5908 (draft-ietf-ntp-dhcpv6-ntp-opt-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6 Publication Date : June 2010 Author(s) : R. Gayraud, B. Lourdelet Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network Time Protocol Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ ntpwg mailing list ntpwg@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg
- [ntpwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5908 (3624) RFC Errata System