IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nvo3] Routing directorate QA review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-01

Jesse Gross <jgross@vmware.com> Fri, 17 June 2016 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jgross@vmware.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3BF12D92B for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=onevmw.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UUXFrBySnFBK for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EX13-EDG-OU-002.vmware.com (ex13-edg-ou-002.vmware.com [208.91.0.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 928A812D8F3 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sc9-mailhost2.vmware.com (10.113.161.72) by EX13-EDG-OU-002.vmware.com (10.113.208.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1156.6; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:50:10 -0700
Received: from EX13-CAS-005.vmware.com (ex13-cas-005.vmware.com [10.113.191.55]) by sc9-mailhost2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941C5B0558; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EX13-MBX-035.vmware.com (10.113.191.76) by EX13-MBX-025.vmware.com (10.113.191.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1156.6; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:50:18 -0700
Received: from EX13-CAS-005.vmware.com (10.113.191.55) by EX13-MBX-035.vmware.com (10.113.191.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1156.6; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:50:18 -0700
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.113.170.11) by EX13-CAS-005.vmware.com (10.113.191.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1156.6 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:50:17 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=onevmw.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-vmware-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=YSXf2xP1FsxOs87rG0MXuE7fQkkgQGgS1NO6wdCWwPo=; b=AerjDgBoZ1+vVtII0adzg718o34qvw5Xt/V4MqIR+B69Rn0RxO/bIoorubEEAVCDjW6pkx7amRlIHX2ypJSGzYHBWbgdL0jFqxxuaOKbtRo9+ZZvSdulvKc72D1qCtOK84DzgTzt4otckpLvSYBzq+Iz5uUoc2h0C6XmxlShQd8=
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1528.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.203.139) by BY1PR0501MB1527.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.203.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.517.8; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:50:16 +0000
Received: from BY1PR0501MB1528.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.203.139]) by BY1PR0501MB1528.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.203.139]) with mapi id 15.01.0523.015; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:50:16 +0000
From: Jesse Gross <jgross@vmware.com>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, "matthew.bocci@nokia.com" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, "bensons@queuefull.net" <bensons@queuefull.net>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nvo3] Routing directorate QA review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-01
Thread-Index: AQHRyOI7BBISzhfkSkOwR55fgjOVfQ==
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:50:15 +0000
Message-ID: <5692D6BE-CC8B-47B9-90DF-C0B08C44A5E3@vmware.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jgross@vmware.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [71.202.123.143]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4172dc9d-94f0-4c54-f656-08d396f95e35
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY1PR0501MB1527; 6:wulDJGo37LAkB3mPPxZqTiyXRznuOZxXM/AfGxR0691moxmV5+p0RoGKxz67rG2A2HFp1G8ei4NA03+9LI7Nak44MA2JkVtmqg4o1wFuxmm6QgFD7VH4Oye/KOI8KHFzOMIqu2iBusA9QFaveVNrZ9VlJem0U9pB8/wa6hkiwp5DCW7Y3ZugNQbVcEZY3sUeFkcWfSO9S1+nzB9r/oauFmZoedlbZ9+7O55KezIuY3Nx86Cgfz7KgEdjYp2WTR645Un5R8kczH3qF7qf/TuWSxI7Pieocf2AWSOEwwjVYak=; 5:/rq1nlwVJ7erloOfbFr5vGbLmXLfrjXTpkkWw4yQJPOV4cbydm7LluJPlKOKCroIOP8VUgiTw3/VNPhC2AO9KZ+nvfc1e8IU3QdHTiF5hiekepHhkdr+T4ccwbbkQybrXx/K5oVCgpvVBMQJ92NqyA==; 24:6cgfcsfYLzVow6GVqdGFYE4Ya+g3EDw3IxKSaK2KZUMRRJX9a+IqQlOa8D1FxO17+AXPlzoSml1SkeFB3CvTMgaf0kVLq8G4mLMqb1ACR88=; 7:Movz/680HbfYpEtPEwVszd5tMReW48gxUS+Wy/0SgjodQ+81OQxjpRwW7bn6ru4wwHgHGJa+p1Is5xsFnALPgoTZp3kvnHhTBasGpV8scfhccai40/W3nHiECSFQnbX/+9/neO2t3IW73+WoRVZ5LLDSMZMTvJsXqBx5ku5ejmxuSHbRMIEiaerKYUwMt+eiYs1w6PLcywO2jB8tzHJJqA==; 20:2gbR3mPvRfV2IbUieiBk9Y7h1j8nQCF9ZJGyQwAjuP7cX+OIqVXYtmzUmjHx93XAq/1TtACnOch5GRHrjjZIdu0xvdwTf9MQ/ePknap+Wdq7fSciFSZLQkWFfumZOh0QSTjdgLnntoh9KxwY0VOVtF4Uk4wZAnGYM5mtEJag5+Y=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1527;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY1PR0501MB15272283C4921350F5B84061BF570@BY1PR0501MB1527.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(138986009662008)(82608151540597)(100405760836317)(21748063052155)(50582790962513);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1527; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1527;
x-forefront-prvs: 09760A0505
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(7916002)(377454003)(66654002)(189002)(199003)(24454002)(2201001)(107886002)(2906002)(83716003)(86362001)(2501003)(189998001)(1941001)(19300405004)(3660700001)(105586002)(106116001)(66066001)(106356001)(36756003)(15975445007)(81156014)(8676002)(81166006)(77096005)(5004730100002)(68736007)(586003)(99286002)(7906002)(92566002)(7846002)(8666005)(54356999)(102836003)(6116002)(3846002)(2900100001)(87936001)(345774005)(19617315012)(19625215002)(16236675004)(10400500002)(101416001)(97736004)(5001770100001)(230783001)(19580395003)(3280700002)(19580405001)(82746002)(11100500001)(33656002)(5002640100001)(50986999)(8936002)(122556002)(7059030)(560514002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR0501MB1527; H:BY1PR0501MB1528.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; CAT:NONE; LANG:en; CAT:NONE;
Received-SPF: None (EX13-EDG-OU-002.vmware.com: jgross@vmware.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: vmware.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5692D6BECC8B47B990DFC0B08C44A5E3vmwarecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Jun 2016 21:50:15.7236 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: b39138ca-3cee-4b4a-a4d6-cd83d9dd62f0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR0501MB1527
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/-T9ymtt7rstQ4-B1Mj2LDehLPUo>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Routing directorate QA review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-01
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:50:21 -0000

John,

Thank you for your review.

In terms of Geneve vs. VXLAN GPE, both of these documents were designed at roughly the same time and have been proceeding through nvo3 in parallel so they are essentially alternatives rather than the situation where one has existed for a while and the other is an extension. The primary difference between the two protocols is point of view when it comes to extensibility and how (or if) it should be done. As a result, the protocol that you are describing (VXLAN-like with TLVs) essentially is Geneve.

Jesse

On 6/17/16, 6:49 AM, "nvo3 on behalf of John E Drake" <nvo3-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:nvo3-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of jdrake@juniper.net<mailto:jdrake@juniper.net>> wrote:

Hi,

I reviewed the draft and I thought it was fine.  The only question I have is whether the authors considered adding the TLV-based capabilities to VXLAN GPE rather than having a similar but different encapsulation header?

Yours Irrespectively,

John

From: Zhangxian (Xian) [mailto:zhang.xian@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 10:14 PM
To: John E Drake
Cc: matthew.bocci@nokia.com; Jonathan Hardwick; Jon Hudson
Subject: Routing directorate QA review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-01


Hi, John,

How are you? I hope everything is fine. There were quite a few drafts that need review and we used all of our review experts within less than two months. And we are circulating back to you now.

Please would you be the routing directorate QA reviewer for draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-01?
​ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve/<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-foo-bar-baz/>

Note that this is a “QA review.” The document does not yet have consensus to be forwarded to the IESG. The goal of this review is to provide a new perspective on the work in progress and to improve its quality. Hence, your comments will be provided primarily for the benefit of the NVO3 chairs and the document authors.

Please could you provide your comments by 28th June? You should send your comments to the draft authors and WG chairs, and copy the relevant WG mailing list and the rtg-dir list.

The following web page contains a briefing on the QA process, and guidance for the QA reviewer.
​https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDirDocQa<https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDirDocQa>

Please let me know whether you can do it, or not.

Many thanks
Xian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email