[nvo3] Two Group-Based Policy drafts submitted for discussion
John Lemon <john.lemon@broadcom.com> Tue, 19 December 2017 00:49 UTC
Return-Path: <john.lemon@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776E7126BF0 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:49:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FY3dRY3sKjUW for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:49:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22a.google.com (mail-wr0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A012124234 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:49:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id h1so16177490wre.12 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:49:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QSwInSs4NJIVEEBcGAnK0OeUu5S9jPHrOxxMIb6rBFs=; b=gmslyU2Y1NeQ24x/4KfbfSPHQVySheIda+OtcdkqxkgtDj4+wpYYfuC65epTKSnOm5 WexztwdJLrKSIKH8P44iTc0PxV9yLsew9ZnKNEFp5RT/DyPgFo+xnXvT9YYqu9rGJrDZ 2N2ItA1Y2QojTUobpjbDGiC/CjhdosJEBQegI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QSwInSs4NJIVEEBcGAnK0OeUu5S9jPHrOxxMIb6rBFs=; b=D9Qahjq0XDsufbbcDNS7x4sUpMUQK3GFzG12vM1qMDdrjeoTTl2Bd4cduA3gZT5TMx +izZqbCeD4YR+50OyPP//VOqvPYIMDNLEL2RDpdXFtSgRoZUrUqbvDFyvWdA1+WDno53 otgbDDseG/GF+DrV3D2c9hpepUjiOaQcV0g6wFAg/W+nKBN4mcpdCkUqgREIa7d9flCD LqODp26DDN3McC+qaV5nCw8zRud+viyHxUnMy8qTxSKRERKxG88QhnNytGWBBnnSOrae Zx58rJT06XcWsuzbELM847YnMnwgRmjw9jcA5P7JaiuYfw1CHEevq3yDd8Kmvj8Ky2xk aK6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJ60Uso/60tQl+IzOCUDOGyZLnn6WzRgbhICkijm9+OtJE4bYlq J3T6XjpvtK5tn/fmpxaPIvoQwEYtnkYgL28V6Iorarav
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBov33lAwFPn4lJk8JhU+cuzv001xDGinj2xJpeXoLQlAal2Y8JkileJMWqUiSzsl5BXbqMnYaOYCICN/x9B1voY=
X-Received: by 10.223.176.201 with SMTP id j9mr2209270wra.54.1513644548668; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:49:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.172.4 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:49:08 -0800 (PST)
From: John Lemon <john.lemon@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:49:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPOJaHywDHaAHi_1xaVtgpJ1imcoZ5H27Owbsaaa5JaUHt1kog@mail.gmail.com>
To: nvo3@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141b584a3e5070560a6d5e0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/5ONVHvXycM1UbJ5IbVq6dY0XYTY>
Subject: [nvo3] Two Group-Based Policy drafts submitted for discussion
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:49:12 -0000
I have submitted two individual I-Ds for including Group-Based Policy along with a tunneled packet. https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lemon-vxlan-gpe-gbp-01.txt documents existing usage that should be documented. This is submitted as Informational because of the use of VXLAN-GPE. https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lemon-geneve-gbp-00.txt documents a proposed encapsulation using Geneve for future usage. This is submitted as Standards Track because it provides an update to Geneve, which is Standards Track. The two drafts provide the same capability, but with currently used tunnel encapsulation or new tunnel encapsulation, respectively. I welcome any comments, discussions, or questions about these drafts. Thanks, John Lemon john.lemon@broadcom.com