IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nvo3] Network Virtualization Overlay Control Plane Requirements posted

Larry Kreeger <kreeger@cisco.com> Tue, 31 January 2012 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <kreeger@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5112D11E80A6 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:28:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.699, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X2IBFc7vXAb8 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:28:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A6511E8089 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:28:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=kreeger@cisco.com; l=2247; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1328041733; x=1329251333; h=date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ac4iHUvneMcVPjVx35Aj1iptG6vYHXr7rbk3RSERIJs=; b=AVAxQ1stneWrb4/OIEX6qOW0pCl58pG4CG4/gnaw7jvY7vpxyp5q4PXN W7BpUs56/eD1WetANVN23B+DLpvskrnz5htXu7qBXSp89yM88UHXhhtZX MgAjRrdyjENB1xazaX9Sx8rrbLD73OrsMzJu3pg3YNDlK+dUdPqFpUcuD A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag8KAMRNKE+rRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABCrWl8gQWBcgEBAQMBAQEBDwEnAgEwAQsFDQEIGE8GMAEBBA4FCRIHh1oJmi0BnliJNIFdASkTAQgFAwMJBwEHBwKELSYBFYMcBIhAjGCLB4du
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,598,1320624000"; d="scan'208";a="27871405"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Jan 2012 20:28:53 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0VKSrx5014763; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:28:53 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-21e.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.156]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:28:53 -0800
Received: from 10.21.92.154 ([10.21.92.154]) by xmb-sjc-21e.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.156]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:28:52 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:28:53 -0800
From: Larry Kreeger <kreeger@cisco.com>
To: sarikaya@ieee.org
Message-ID: <CB4D8F05.53761%kreeger@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [nvo3] Network Virtualization Overlay Control Plane Requirements posted
Thread-Index: AczgVvKqHWRMUOAhoEercf+FwQP1sg==
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcfmP5h+mmfbGwka6u2Ccn52agSVuy+_S03ESSOGT-t-Og@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jan 2012 20:28:53.0173 (UTC) FILETIME=[F2C55650:01CCE056]
Cc: nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Network Virtualization Overlay Control Plane Requirements posted
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "L2 \"Network Virtualization Over l3\" overlay discussion list \(nvo3\)" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:28:54 -0000

Hi Behcet,

I did try to send an email to the dc list about the draft as a BCC, but
since it was a BCC, it was sent to the moderator for approval.  When I saw
it hadn't been approved today, I went ahead and sent it directly, so
everyone on the dc list should now be aware of it.

I have no great excuse for why I didn't add a references section, except
that I'm just learning the xml tool and was having problems getting the
references generated, so I figured I would figure it out in a later
revision.

 - Larry


On 1/31/12 11:53 AM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Larry,
> 
> There is no references section in this draft, even though it does have
> a reference?
> Why was not this I-D submitted to dc?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Behcet
> 
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Larry Kreeger <kreeger@cisco.com> wrote:
>> To: nvo3 mailing list
>> Bcc: l2vpn, l3vpn, dc, armd, vpn4dc mailing lists
>> 
>> Hi everyone,
>> 
>> I have recently posted a first draft of the Control Plane requirements for
>> Network Virtualization Overlays.
>> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kreeger-nvo3-overlay-cp-00.txt
>> 
>> This draft is a follow-up to draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01
>> ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01
>> ) which makes the case for overlay networks in data centers (not restricted
>> to L2 over L3) and the need for control plane solutions.
>> 
>> If you have not read draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01, I
>> highly suggest reading it first because the posted control plane reqs
>> document picks up where it left off.
>> 
>> Since the posted draft is a followup to
>> draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01 , and there is already an
>> NVO3 mailing list, please join and post any discussion and/or comments to
>> nvo3@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Larry Kreeger
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> nvo3 mailing list
>> nvo3@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> nvo3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email