Re: [nvo3] WG Adoption Call - draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan (04/10/24 - 04/26/24)

Peng Liu <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com> Fri, 19 April 2024 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D32C14F691; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 20:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.885
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S1igc00cNa7o; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 20:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta6.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.139]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E70C14F617; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 20:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app05-12005 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee56621e9bbd9c-5e640; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:49:15 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee56621e9bbd9c-5e640
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from CMCC-LP (unknown[10.2.146.62]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr09-12009 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee96621e9b80ba-37b1d; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:49:14 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee96621e9b80ba-37b1d
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:49:16 +0800
From: Peng Liu <liupengyjy@chinamobile.com>
To: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>, rtgwg <rtgwg@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, nvo3-chairs <nvo3-chairs@ietf.org>, nvo3 <nvo3@ietf.org>
References: <CABY-gOPp3xJsQfbVvWvANsKZSQbPwKimZyx94w2wETSEQHGz7g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 98ED1C8C-0A33-4002-8686-3DBBFA879D68
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.21.453[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202404191149152457243@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart465347536457_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/QvzizN26ffz4-uexxFyF5KIOwlk>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] WG Adoption Call - draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan (04/10/24 - 04/26/24)
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 03:49:41 -0000

Hi WG,

This draft looks useful for the interconnection among multiple segments of SD-WAN under the IPsec encryption enviroment. 

The use cases are valid and the solution seems to be reasonable. So I support the adoption.

Regards,
Peng


liupengyjy@chinamobile.com
 
From: Yingzhen Qu
Date: 2024-04-11 02:01
To: RTGWG; rtgwg-chairs; nvo3-chairs; nvo3
Subject: WG Adoption Call - draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan (04/10/24 - 04/26/24)
Hi,

This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft: draft-dmk-rtgwg-multisegment-sdwan-07 - Multi-segment SD-WAN via Cloud DCs (ietf.org)

After the draft was presented at IETF 119, the chairs did a poll of the draft, and here are the questions and results:
"Do you think the multi-segment SD-WAN as described in the draft is a use case that the IETF should work on?"
yes: 20 no: 9 no_opinion: 33 total: 84
"Do you support adoption of this work in RTGWG?"
yes: 9 no: 9 no_opinion: 25 total: 92

There is currently one IPR disclosure of this draft: IPR disclosures (ietf.org)
Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft.

The draft proposes a solution which extends GENEVE, so also copying NVO3 WG. If you don't think the draft should be adopted in RTGWG, please voice your opinion.

Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by Apr 26th, 2024.

Thanks,
Yingzhen