Re: [nvo3] Call for WG Adoption of draft-herbert-gue-03

Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> Thu, 19 March 2015 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B8A1A901F for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FclWjCEr9ou4 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com (mail-ig0-f177.google.com [209.85.213.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 059171A8822 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igcau2 with SMTP id au2so655499igc.0 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=q2+Veug787lztnNxb/dWjmukZ21ArOCQvJDhK6mBaFw=; b=aWoM+vjs4OZSuhGEkXOB8Ko0MJ8Uua39WN2QKswYl34a1k06JUIES8xOFdLYLiRt1N nxLZUEiUjKVu6oO8eDDzVNmxqsJTQGhAlxyaheJltgo330p0FEo0/wNFIpciBlyLf/Gb t1zeZb57kGdkbo1w4r9WNWhBjMbLfpAiQ9kwt5sqmu1XnCSYrsuDNMIvm5LTP5xR4Gcn kZmRArhriXbVHFxxmExJpqogOjB8cB10jREz7p4lDbtZIhplUoquT9T6rRdde+06w7j1 6i19+XlnRwwKBML/c2tL7J3wv8Sl7T66JfFbf5eTmDZIMoToaW3seJ+RIX2v4s954ZZs BUDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmJYQlFT5YMScnI5T0m0VDkd6qbiWixKnywRGWTBAudCXmlftMPwsACShB+wW3Mua9CP3qk
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.128.226 with SMTP id k95mr55480092ioi.73.1426796824520; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.149.15 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <550B1616.6040507@queuefull.net>
References: <550B1616.6040507@queuefull.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:27:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CALx6S34KKfpA8rD4qwJRWSbtu6+H7Y1nVj6Xb8soZKPE4rtP_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
To: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/kBBjtyZXrnUf7meTwAz2yB4dge4>
Cc: "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Call for WG Adoption of draft-herbert-gue-03
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:27:07 -0000

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Benson Schliesser
<bensons@queuefull.net> wrote:
> This message starts a 2-week Call for Adoption of draft-herbert-gue-03 as a
> NVO3 WG item.
>
Benson asked me to query the list on this...

There is a subtlety for GUE.

draft-herbert-gue-03 specifies GUE as a generic encapsulation
protocol.The use of GUE for network virtualization is specified in
draft-hy-nvo3-gue-4-nvo-01. We also specified the security which I
believe is critical to NVO3 deployment in
draft-hy-gue-4-secure-transport-01.

I personally think it's a good idea to keep the general specification
somewhat decoupled from the network virtualization use case as we are
already seeing deployment use cases for that. But for purposes of WG
adoption in NVO3 these is a question as to how we should proceed:

Should we request WG adoption for each of these?
Is it okay to just request adoption of the primary GUE draft?
Should we consolidate these into one draft for NVO3 purposes?

Thanks,
Tom

> The chairs believe that WG consensus is in favor of adoption of this draft.
> Please reply to this email thread, to the nvo3 email list, with expressions
> of support or opposition. If expressing opposition to adoption please
> elaborate substantially on the issues that motivate this view.
>
> This Call for Adoption will conclude on 2015-03-15, at which times the
> chairs will reevaluate their view of consensus based on mailing list
> discussion.
>
> Thanks,
> -Benson & Matthew
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nvo3 mailing list
> nvo3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3