IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nvo3] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-12: (with COMMENT)

xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Thu, 24 August 2023 07:25 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A609DC15155C; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YcLaz8t6LVWf; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C319AC14CE46; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:25:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4RWZNq0gRrz8XrRF; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 15:25:15 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4RWZNH2hQhz4xpxK; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 15:24:47 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app07.zte.com.cn ([10.55.22.95]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 37O7OdvU019742; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 15:24:39 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app04[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 15:24:41 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 15:24:41 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afc64e705b9ffffffff96c-66483
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202308241524416377463@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <169141554162.7606.6879172772467364239@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: 169141554162.7606.6879172772467364239@ietfa.amsl.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve@ietf.org, nvo3-chairs@ietf.org, nvo3@ietf.org, matthew.bocci@nokia.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 37O7OdvU019742
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 64E705DB.000/4RWZNq0gRrz8XrRF
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/lYrDg0HrKddxIi3MSMC7kTK1rt8>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 07:25:48 -0000

Hi Zaheduzzaman,






Thank you for the review and thoughtful comments.


Please see inline.




Original



From: ZaheduzzamanSarkerviaDatatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;
Cc: draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve@ietf.org <draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve@ietf.org>;nvo3-chairs@ietf.org <nvo3-chairs@ietf.org>;nvo3@ietf.org <nvo3@ietf.org>;matthew.bocci@nokia.com <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>;matthew.bocci@nokia.com <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>;
Date: 2023年08月07日 21:39
Subject: [nvo3] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-12: (with COMMENT)


Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-12: No Objection
 
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
 
 
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/  
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
 
 
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve/
 
 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Thanks for working on this specification. Special thanks to Magnus Westerlund
for identifying an important aspect in his TSVART review and I am happy to see
the resolution in the -11 version of this doc.
 
I have stumbled upon similar clarification issues that John has brought up in
his discuss. It not clear to me how this validation need to be done as written
in Section 5.1
 
     Then the UDP destination port and the TTL or Hop Limit of the inner IP
     packet MUST be validated to determine whether the received packet can be
     processed by BFD.
 
I was expecting pointers for those validation mechanism special to BFD. Can we
be more clear on this?
 [XM]>>> Yes. A new revision has just been posted, attempting to address all received comments. Link as below.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve-13

Please check whether this version clarifies the issue.





Best Regards,

Xiao Min

_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
nvo3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email