[nwcrg] Fwd: about LOOPS(Localized Optimization of Path Segments) and etosat

Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com> Fri, 04 January 2019 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
X-Original-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137D7130FEA for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 07:28:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mjmontpetit-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6TBgTbXlEJvk for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 07:28:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com (mail-qt1-x832.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AF16130FE8 for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 07:28:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id v11so40723966qtc.2 for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 07:28:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mjmontpetit-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:cc:to:message-id; bh=xgcLzep7JtVLgb01L5vN+yc1ko9EoZzgFN5Yd1UDtoI=; b=CoaYHFH0F1J15hZxUc6so4cV5vEWBpjdAFT50o8bUEobFulH9C5N48tlcbo0DZLSbR KjynbyyIsbDGdXJ61/sTSP4TeoHotI2lBrewTSwMW0qBDvtM983YW54mwK11eq+Fhzis vAMgTWcWRni2ie312DKIf2H9Kc2kNyvltkqhYgs3zb+lw+NJmEGUULHTJfytvNr9OINg U1hoMPzGcGWlF3j8Q1rIbkpHtjqekrvnQ6uBW25VLKdQ9fScGLoNRl8ibgAdqg8RqltH 2zmL3LTw7ugKoKhAQq8JL1rLIB3zQCG7SwwFdtYb9l1cRh2r46RyiZ4bFGbfakmS3lms HPkQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:cc:to :message-id; bh=xgcLzep7JtVLgb01L5vN+yc1ko9EoZzgFN5Yd1UDtoI=; b=lEKKnZwEntohDHbT2J1TrXZSdHRRfoO9tvtVnzupiJ2r3JfbAm+XX4qzW2/hPZJybo J+4g92yuevOmpFM+iEUouWYJB61+PnmaGl+97x8ynroFUfJuW9rVAb2Jz9FwFCR2EswO o+KEITWszltz+fmINDatUu79Vs2NuQFFYg/KliJxFZ8+BEbqH8O52OaHQ6j02bf/vGDR MsrNSh9cfoM7yVPLwRHFDBeT6AGi65hQRzbAKyN7i474iIksySvN+f+wHfMqDv9y9CjB 0KrsjTz1hiY9vSMcvfefGi+yXS51N6bPUU20CTiJ/pMqBbwlbXCVRu8s+wP7SNQ2sUyl IK6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZs4tA0eYF/5/Ttm+jMr4vOtWhCmKXupLAZqoj33WAQU4byRwPX BLv2uAeUOQ1SynemKCeyoYQP8g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6xf4vgRUiN7Nso8EUTPTRgb1/BLbAph94PuQoYcwH1IStmDVG8FeQrs7/ic1ifSwDF1poZgg==
X-Received: by 2002:aed:2122:: with SMTP id 31mr50533523qtc.270.1546615715116; Fri, 04 Jan 2019 07:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from heidi-lamarr.fios-router.home (pool-173-76-235-112.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [173.76.235.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c48sm30811894qtd.9.2019.01.04.07.28.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Jan 2019 07:28:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AA6EB09F-FCCF-452D-A234-2FD259073518"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 10:28:29 -0500
References: <BL0PR11MB3394C0EE1249C918BC33448C908D0@BL0PR11MB3394.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, "Border, John" <john.border@hughes.com>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: coin@irtf.org, nwcrg <nwcrg@irtf.org>
Message-Id: <3774BAEE-4239-4AA6-99E9-70F99553D408@mjmontpetit.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nwcrg/H5EJFKFuYpRomUXT0tIXEDgQTJM>
Subject: [nwcrg] Fwd: about LOOPS(Localized Optimization of Path Segments) and etosat
X-BeenThere: nwcrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Network Coding Research Group discussion list <nwcrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nwcrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 15:28:48 -0000

While this started as a discussion of satellite implications of encrypted links the attached files mentions FEC/coding as well as per hop optimization hence that relevant to the coin and nwcrg communities.

While this is FYI at this moment the issues could lead to more cross-lists discussions. 

mjm

Marie-Jose Montpetit, Ph.D.
mariejo@mit.edu
marie@mjmontpetit.com
+1-781-526-2661
@SocialTVMIT



> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: "Border, John" <John.Border@hughes.com>
> Subject: FW: about LOOPS(Localized Optimization of Path Segments) and etosat
> Date: January 3, 2019 at 12:48:31 PM EST
> To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Liyizhou <liyizhou@huawei.com>
> Cc: "etosat@ietf.org" <etosat@ietf.org>, Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
> 
> 
> 
> Clearly LOOPS should not focus only on satellite.  But, I think LOOPS is directly relevant to ETOSAT.  Techniques like LOOPS are likely to be a key part of the solution to the performance over satellite problem.
> 
> I will be sending out an email to ETOSAT in the next couple of days to try to kickstart discussion overall.
> 
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> 
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2018 5:59 PM
> To: Border, John <John.Border@hughes.com>
> Cc: Liyizhou <liyizhou@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: about LOOPS(Localized Optimization of Path Segments) and etosat
> 
> Hi John,
> 
>> On Dec 7, 2018, at 10:37, Liyizhou <liyizhou@huawei.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I copied to Carsten who was leading the side meeting. He might provide more information.
> 
> As Yizhou said, there are no formal minutes of this side meeting, but I did record my impressions in the attached short summary.  I have also attached the slides that we used, as the summary may not be comprehensible without those.
> 
> Given that Spencer specifically asked us to discuss this in the context of etosat, it would certainly help to know what the intentions were in creating this list and to speculate a bit how a potential etosat activity might cross-pollinate with LOOPS.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten