Re: [nwcrg] nwcrg Digest, Vol 42, Issue 7
Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com> Tue, 25 April 2017 10:30 UTC
Return-Path: <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
X-Original-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7463112EB2C for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 03:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_EMBEDS=1.799, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mjmontpetit-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fZJohG964fa8 for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 03:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22d.google.com (mail-qt0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4CBC12EB38 for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 03:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id g60so135879612qtd.3 for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 03:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mjmontpetit-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to; bh=LKxC7OueplXZN0i/2oeadxTlfpTc0fZ96I3u9mVwfWY=; b=dCCpsHM+gDzrTiaWQNumgX5kpJQYI3n1TbeVC56j9KDGVLHtmJyBIm520QMxU+zt9z OIjSpdGLFBjGbfD7cvfVC25C+yoF+EiHZa8+pHBBGhv6oXhvUH5U6QjDMp7azGNflfZV FWHwnzkKGjQsHFaxfIEMWLZ6G5zg8yCYszrYBWTrZBiBohzFpW+DmPo3UEAzzKCahmh9 +7K0mbMHf+1PgHLVWQc1pihnFpk3ccvWYMGvzvZgFotZ/gMgzqK+47A6ahf79/N7uCnX qLJlPzwzjP+8G/ashSBciHeQQy8A+md+ZbWW8qLbMINGAs/rEQmNl7nRl22ZZ3ASzPGT NqJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :references:to:in-reply-to; bh=LKxC7OueplXZN0i/2oeadxTlfpTc0fZ96I3u9mVwfWY=; b=l57aJsUU5nsJcY/D73scNIqpDqKZ6C+1gSwiyb9cS8Ohixw2EEAfCasaQrVBBQOr1e g3lexMOEg82uK8kyXtWU+Xqo90DZqrW2ionFN05hKXN8+Pbn9LAAy/al7juJVawkFY1Y 2AaeXMGfb3Cw3B9Bv4n9zuPSEF6v1D+BgDzohoqsYwuM/S2YyViDcjpEZxKn/5nRNi4v mqI/MCDxzzRQPXZ0AuxURQitEjRgtmAf8OCNA6nm9mmd1jx5Sf7YKherAOvAFzPGzAVo eYMjxzRO110Umpso2UWJQ6aaRWGH7X5YP6mCz0Ntu9u/Dw+4ludAjoxTVPKmPQK0oYPH 5puw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6Dg0j+dXbMczQBL1ZE3EfND20yqfCMFd8KP4oQdBjzNcrq92wk 9aHKc08KpFV3Umt757A=
X-Received: by 10.237.52.5 with SMTP id w5mr20160276qtd.22.1493116206785; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 03:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:197:a80:5dcd:fd39:2249:b048:9c5c? ([2601:197:a80:5dcd:fd39:2249:b048:9c5c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 24sm14817601qtx.8.2017.04.25.03.30.05 for <nwcrg@irtf.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Apr 2017 03:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7CE83E28-4FEB-4148-B606-B6B1F6C18A74"
Message-Id: <F0DA5F3A-B611-4C34-9951-4B1683D15AE6@mjmontpetit.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 06:30:04 -0400
References: <mailman.2956.1493110753.3988.nwcrg@irtf.org>
To: nwcrg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <mailman.2956.1493110753.3988.nwcrg@irtf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nwcrg/HI0mdryJ3jgGtdn8LKlGKZp3bPQ>
Subject: Re: [nwcrg] nwcrg Digest, Vol 42, Issue 7
X-BeenThere: nwcrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Network Coding Research Group discussion list <nwcrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nwcrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:30:19 -0000
The Satcom report is interesting but does not address higher layers (they talk of traditional FEC) and of course the voice requirements are poorly met. I think the NC and advanced caching in the ICN model could yes address some operational issues (pre-staging). It would also be interesting to see how NC could support a more multipath solution (beyond multi-satellite) combining space and terrestrial solutions. mjm > On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:59 AM, nwcrg-request@irtf.org wrote: > > Send nwcrg mailing list submissions to > nwcrg@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > nwcrg-request@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org> > > You can reach the person managing the list at > nwcrg-owner@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg-owner@irtf.org> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of nwcrg digest..." > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: nwcrg Digest, Vol 42, Issue 4 (Emmanuel Lochin) > > From: Emmanuel Lochin <emmanuel.lochin@isae.fr <mailto:emmanuel.lochin@isae.fr>> > Subject: Re: [nwcrg] nwcrg Digest, Vol 42, Issue 4 > Date: April 25, 2017 at 4:56:55 AM EDT > To: nwcrg@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org> > > > Dear Rolf, > > Following your email you might be interested in this final report : > http://www.era.europa.eu/Document-Register/Documents/SRAIL-FNR-010-IND%20-%20FinalReport_v1.1_20170216.pdf <http://www.era.europa.eu/Document-Register/Documents/SRAIL-FNR-010-IND%20-%20FinalReport_v1.1_20170216.pdf> > > EL > > Le 25/04/2017 à 10:02, Rolf Sperber a écrit : >> Hi Cedric, >> >> there is a strong request from Deutsche Bahn to better enable internet access on fast moving trains. Your proposal CCN plus NC would be a good approach to solve this problem and I’d be very much in favor of you rewriting your paper as a draft. >> >> Best regards >> >> Rolf >> >> >> >> >> Rolf Sperber >> Birkenstrasse 5 >> 76676 Graben-Neudorf >> GERMANY >> Rolf.Sperber@embrace-net.de <mailto:Rolf.Sperber@embrace-net.de> >> Phone: +49 7255 9000987 >> Mobile: +49 151 21262119 >> skype: rolf.rs01 >> >> Von: nwcrg <nwcrg-bounces@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg-bounces@irtf.org>> on behalf of Cedric Westphal <Cedric.Westphal@huawei.com <mailto:Cedric.Westphal@huawei.com>> >> Datum: Samstag, 22. April 2017 um 01:53 >> An: Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com <mailto:marie@mjmontpetit.com>>, "nwcrg@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org>" <nwcrg@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org>> >> Betreff: Re: [nwcrg] nwcrg Digest, Vol 42, Issue 4 >> >> Hi Marie-Jose, >> >> There has been a lot of work on network coding in ICN since our 2012 paper. We made an implementation using CCN that we described here for rate adaptive video streaming: https://users.soe.ucsc.edu/~cedric/papers/ramakrishnan2016adaptive.pdf <https://users.soe.ucsc.edu/%7Ecedric/papers/ramakrishnan2016adaptive.pdf> >> If you think it would be interesting to write it up as a draft, I’d be willing to do it! >> Best, >> >> C. >> >> From: Marie-Jose Montpetit [mailto:marie@mjmontpetit.com <mailto:marie@mjmontpetit.com>] >> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 4:23 PM >> To: nwcrg@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org> >> Cc: Jesus Jimenez; Verizon; Lars Erup; Aneesh Dalvi; Brandon Williams; Prof. Jianping Wang; Ian Swett; Cedric Westphal; Dirk Trossen; Sheau Ng; Lars Eggert; Hannes Tschofenig >> Subject: Re: nwcrg Digest, Vol 42, Issue 4 >> >> See some comments below. >> On Apr 21, 2017, at 3:00 PM, nwcrg-request@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org> wrote: >> >> Send nwcrg mailing list submissions to >> nwcrg@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org> >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg> >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> nwcrg-request@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org> >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> nwcrg-owner@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg-owner@irtf.org> >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of nwcrg digest..." >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Structuring NWCRG activities: a few ideas... (Vincent Roca) >> >> From: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr <mailto:vincent.roca@inria.fr>> >> Subject: [nwcrg] Structuring NWCRG activities: a few ideas... >> Date: April 21, 2017 at 3:36:40 AM EDT >> To: nwcrg@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org> >> >> >> Hello everybody, >> >> Here are a few topics related to « coding for efficient network communications » on which we could work within the >> NWCRG. >> >> Use-cases where end-to-end coding or network coding can be beneficial: >> >> - NC for satellite communications >> I think there is already some work in Inmarsat and most likely other work that could be brought forward. Lars Erup: any comment? Worth a draft? >> >> - NC for ICN/CCN >> We had a paper some time ago with Cedric and Dirk. We showed that NC improved cache hits. Prof. JIanping Wang may have related work. >> >> - NC for NFV >> We know this is happening. >> >> - Virtual/Augmented Reality: can NC help and how? >> This is my own thing these days after working with the MIT movie makers. I could be open to do a draft if anyone is interested. >> >> - Robust, low latency tunnels: this could be the basis of a generic protocol >> Relates to NFV and of course SDN. >> >> - something else? >> >> On the Coding side: >> >> - applying sliding window codes for low latency, robust communications >> - sliding window codes: several of them have been presented in the past few years during NWCRG meetings >> (or elsewhere). It’s time to go further with specifications, comparisons, work on advanced features, etc. >> - something else? >> Security implications of course. NC can provide “soft protection”. Anything we could do better? >> >> >> Well there is a Tetrys draft in the group but there was never a RLNC draft in the tradition of Raptors or LDPC. There was mention of fulcrum. Do we have a clear idea of how many network codes are being researched now? >> >> >> A « nice to have »: >> >> - open source sliding window codecs, not encumbered with complex licensing conditions or (hopefully) IPR >> - open source NC solution, here also not encumbered with complex licensing conditions or (hopefully) IPR >> I think it’s not nice to have - it’s essential we cannot see if for example a ICN app (multi-source multidestination) can be improved by NC or to try a new NC/CC algorithm is we have to go through license negociations or eventual patent infringement - you know I love Open Source >> >> - work on a generic API for sliding window codes >> Something to talk to TAPS >> >> >> Transversal questions for most of the above topics: >> >> - Q: what are the research topics we’d like to address? There are in particular many important and tough questions >> on relationships with congestion control and fairness with other flows. >> There is work at the Hamilton Institute on NC/CC as well as elsewhere - can we get draft from the inventors (with patent protection of course) >> >> - Q: can we derive a generic architecture from existing NC deployments? >> I actually think that when we tried to have a generic architecture we ended up in an NC Gordian Knot. I think we should target “architectures” than highlight the different researchers environments. >> >> >> >> Our group can produce Internet-drafts (and informational or experimental RFCs). This is a good manner to have >> concrete activities that can be discussed within the group and that authors can valorize. I encourage you all to think >> about it. >> But inputs can also take other forms: research articles published elsewhere (or not) provided as input for discussions, >> presentations during next IETF99 meeting (Prague, Czech Republic). >> I may not have funding for IETF 99 (dear leaders: this is the height of the tourist season in a hot place and of course the IETF registration is really high) >> >> >> Part of the above work is of research type, the rest is more applied. Even if we are a research group, this second >> aspect can both fuel research activities and potentially future IETF work. Therefore it will not considered as out of >> scope. >> :-) >> >> >> Finally, please consider the above topic as inputs for discussions. Good ideas are always welcome, nothing is fixed. >> :-) >> >> Happy weekend all. And happy Earth Day. Hope to see some of you at the March for Science. >> >> mjm >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Vincent >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nwcrg mailing list >> nwcrg@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org> >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg> >> >> _______________________________________________ nwcrg mailing list nwcrg@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nwcrg mailing list >> nwcrg@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org> >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg> > > > -- > Emmanuel LOCHIN > Professeur ISAE > ISAE SUPAERO - Institut Supérieur de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace > 10 avenue Edouard Belin - BP 54032 - 31055 TOULOUSE CEDEX 4 FRANCE - > http://www.isae-supaero.fr <http://www.isae-supaero.fr/> > Tel +33 5 61 33 84 85 - Fax (+33) 5 61 33 83 45 > Web : http://personnel.isae.fr/emmanuel-lochin/ <http://personnel.isae.fr/emmanuel-lochin/> > > > _______________________________________________ > nwcrg mailing list > nwcrg@irtf.org <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg>
- Re: [nwcrg] nwcrg Digest, Vol 42, Issue 7 Marie-Jose Montpetit