[nwcrg] draft-wang-tsvwg-sw-slc-fec-scheme-03.txt

Ray Wang <wangruihit@gmail.com> Fri, 17 June 2022 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <wangruihit@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04DEC157B34 for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 03:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IDrleZmOCHXh for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 03:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35E7BC15AAC6 for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 03:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id cn20so5590515edb.6 for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 03:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=27w4Q4GQAZciJv9Nv6gVoWRnlw9Owvt/TJvBNnlj1CY=; b=RpO4aqRMRkUOoHFrYmbdljEP7xibIU89QQaFJVX5OT+KDFbKfbYM9QzYbd1QhzTPVM shyf9ZLsiTsjIJPqNsO/e7OsMkismuSXsqn7FuER4WKoQsrX6Dd+5WPMiYFRAyxUU+0q ttrXCIJ49rBIp9ZZFxAL9+BOh8Qbc4dOKavRlFemEgJ7khp91nVEIMEtVTv1qP4/yo/1 BOwsbr4ajjCVS5OmdU3PstB1ONNkqz1XT7wikNzOpC5UbWEbrf5Y6IEvvFHzVTt4ehcu qsO2nFWNMBNkeRPKLNKRt1lbv7ix0qv+EWptFSyxxbqz/iHE38ykiKh4K7livaz34tx5 JLjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=27w4Q4GQAZciJv9Nv6gVoWRnlw9Owvt/TJvBNnlj1CY=; b=NooY3pFSXzSGvZ0J+TdcOSfSpqVHRhE8yGL01UBCoZuBkmKUQ1eTqA+K7+f56fnAsW TKlpSY4FUar69Dff0JTTEpSQQzQsRkmVrA+byUL31YnJxhGzF5Hv5FHtjcSO+g5pWECa PvlVTw9QnX5gKUV38LJITfZEqzS9c6VbfTLuofCweXFUW5j4uvWv0vfPaQnTkPiR4i8B QyFNBrZsDZNdOKJcxH15p71jDbZqmMhIAp5Btu4BMR77B/ClddCDSZQBXYRXghRmIYOv eDrkgTuKhbKrwtVjHxi/feaiE6tmCYTBtAIJncqCVMtcx2I2XSVBcrpjJB17mbvqzVCf 3Bug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9LZ90WqiLUILNX6X6Ej9F5WIbN+qrOHxHNvQfPNamhfbEVpleu CdXPsVN+a9Pf0EaU4SjTU9UvMLK7M1eOiVUI7EbYxJCv6V8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sF0ypmMO+XhzcNSxY8gcoNhBt86KDBUVWZhKcwAHUlxAqIg1W0XdMdAOozxpAE7ALWixUwzICVa7h/NO295DQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:13d9:b0:42d:c97e:f9cf with SMTP id a25-20020a05640213d900b0042dc97ef9cfmr11321237edx.271.1655461343318; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 03:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Ray Wang <wangruihit@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 18:22:11 +0800
Message-ID: <CAL+ujzMOCwZkPSWBab8YS97+WFU=stWZfC8=3XAiWNjRU3iMPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org, nwcrg@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004ed95f05e1a22116"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nwcrg/VFPtR7vZ17q2n-SPKylyNa1fyso>
Subject: [nwcrg] draft-wang-tsvwg-sw-slc-fec-scheme-03.txt
X-BeenThere: nwcrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Network Coding Research Group discussion list <nwcrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nwcrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 10:22:27 -0000

Dear tsvwg & nwcrg members,


We have submitted a draft to discuss Sliding Window Forward Error
Correction(FEC) in conjunction with Layered video coding.

Sliding window FEC has been adopted on our platform, and the video QoE
statistics in the production environment proved the advantage of sliding
window FEC over the block FEC scheme.

Layered encoding is also commonly used in video streaming applications to
provide appropriate video quality to end-users with various downlink
conditions and device capabilities.

When Sliding Window FEC works together with layered video coding, a
continuous encoding window as defined in RFC8681 may no longer be optimal,
our new draft combines sliding window FEC with source video coding and can
achieve a better video Quality of Experience.


Any comments and suggestions on this document are appreciated.


Best Regards

Ray


A new version of I-D, draft-wang-tsvwg-sw-slc-fec-scheme-03.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Bifeng He and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name:           draft-wang-tsvwg-sw-slc-fec-scheme
> Revision:       03
> Title:          Sliding Window Selective Linear Code (SLC) Forward Error
> Correction (FEC) Scheme for FECFRAME
> Document date:  2022-06-14
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          20
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-wang-tsvwg-sw-slc-fec-scheme-03.txt
> Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-tsvwg-sw-slc-fec-scheme/
> Html:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-wang-tsvwg-sw-slc-fec-scheme-03.html
> Htmlized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wang-tsvwg-sw-slc-fec-scheme
>
> Abstract:
>    RFC8680 describes a framework for using Sliding Window Forward Error
>    Correction(FEC) codes to protection against packet loss, the
>    framework significantly improves FEC efficiency and reduces FEC-
>    related added latency compared to block FEC codes defined in RFC
>    6363.  RFC8681 further describes two fully specified FEC schemes for
>    Sliding Window Random Linear Codes(RLC), the schemes rely on an
>    encoding window that slides over a continuous set of source symbols,
>    generating new repair symbols whenever needed.  This document
>    describes a fully specified FEC scheme for Sliding Window Selective
>    Linear Code(SLC) over the Galois Field GF (2^^8) , compared to
>    RFC8681, this framework use a discrete encoding window which can
>    protect arbitrary media streams selectively, and has better recovery
>    performance in scenarios such as layered video coding or mixed
>    streams for video streaming applications.
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>