Re: [oam] Agenda for OAM Meeting

"David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net> Sat, 09 October 2010 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: oam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24FB3A696D for <oam@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.309
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.309 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.290, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bIXSnCBw0QKm for <oam@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E683A697F for <oam@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:43:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GQN11f0040QuhwU5EQkJGM; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:44:18 +0000
Received: from 23FX1C1 ([67.189.235.106]) by omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GQkJ1f00C2JQnJT3NQkJtP; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:44:18 +0000
From: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: 'Ronald Bonica' <rbonica@juniper.net>, oam@ietf.org
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B020AC31ED@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:42:59 -0400
Message-ID: <F36E73C16A104BBD9D8BAECDA57C202B@23FX1C1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: ActnIUP4skuQzEGaTueLUd8rTsGwlQAKK4NQ
In-Reply-To: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B020AC31ED@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994
Subject: Re: [oam] Agenda for OAM Meeting
X-BeenThere: oam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For discussion and announcements related to the IAB/IESG joint design session on Forwarding Plane Operations, Administration and Maintenance \(OAM\)." <oam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oam>, <mailto:oam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oam>
List-Post: <mailto:oam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oam>, <mailto:oam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 00:43:18 -0000

Hi,

I suggest a minor but significant change:
OLD:
Open Microphone: What direction should the IETF take?
NEW:
Open Microphone: What direction should the Design Team recommend? 

I would not want anybody to think that this design team session will
make that decision for the IETF.
A design team can only present their recommendations to the IETF. 
The IETF will make the decision whether to accept those
recommendations.

and, wouldn't it be better to have this open mike question after
hearing all the presentations?
I suggest moving one of the presentations from Wedesday to Tuesday,
and moving this question to Wednesday just before the consens sall for
an architecture paper.

David Harrington
Director, IETF Transport Area
ietfdbh@comcast.net (preferred for ietf)
dbharrington@huaweisymantec.com
+1 603 828 1401 (cell)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: oam-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oam-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Ronald Bonica
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 3:45 PM
> To: oam@ietf.org
> Subject: [oam] Agenda for OAM Meeting
> 
> The IESG/IAB OAM Joint Design session will be held from 
> October 12 and 14 at George Mason University in Fairfax, 
> Virginia. Sessions will be held in the Edwin Meese III 
> Conference Room in the Mason Hall. For a map of campus, see 
> the following URL:
> 
>         http://eagle.gmu.edu/map/fairfax.php?building=mason_hall
> 
> Submissions have been light, so I have allotted more time 
> than is really necessary for each presentation, allowing for 
> lots of bickering. One would hope that at the end of this 
> exercise, the design team will have reached some kind 
> consensus and would be able to publish an Internet Draft 
> regarding OAM requirements for tunneled applications and 
> tunneling technologies.
> 
> At least one presenter has indicated that he will not be 
> there in person. So, we are working on remote presentation 
> capabilities.
> 
> Agenda follows:
> 
> 
> Tuesday, October 12
> ===================
> 
> 8:00  Continental Breakfast
> 9:30  Workshop Goals / Agenda Bashing /Logistics
> 10:00 draft-bonica-oam-considerations-00 (Baker/Bonica)
> 10:45 Break
> 11:00 draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-overview (Sprecher)
> 12:00 Lunch (on your own)
> 1:30  Forwarding Plane OAM for MPLS-based Tunneling 
> Applications (Vainshtein)
> 2:30  ALU MPLS-TP OAM Proposal (Alcatel presenters)
> 3:30  Break
> 4:00  Open Microphone: What direction should the IETF take?
> 5:00  Wrap-up
> 
> 
> Wednesday, October 13
> =====================
> 8:00  Continental Breakfast
> 9:30  MPLS-OAM Position Paper (Gray, Mansfield, Allen)
> 10:30 Break
> 10:45 Traceroute Across Encapsulation Boundaries (Skriver)
> 11:45 Lunch (on your own)
> 1:15  Getting Underlying Information (Kobayashi)
> 2:15  Break
> 2:30  Open Microphone: Reaching consensus for architectural paper
> 5:00  Wrap-up
> 
> Thursday, October 14
> ====================
> 8:00  Continental Breakfast
> 9:30  Late submissions/last minute controversies
> 11:00 wrap up
> 
>