Re: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?

Which document?
Generic Tunneling mechanism? 
Is it requirements? Architecture? Else?

-----Original Message-----
From: oam-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oam-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
ext Yaakov Stein
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:50 PM
To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Adrian Farrel; oam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?

Dan and Adrian

It depends on how many people are interested in working on this
document.

I have no problem with the OPS area providing a "home" for this work,
but am not sure that it is a good fit (a lot of it is MPLS-TP related).

Y(J)S

-----Original Message-----
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 21:47
To: Adrian Farrel; Yaakov Stein; oam@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?

That's certainly fine and they can do it at any time. I was misguided by
the ' too late to request scheduling of an official BOF' in his initial
mail. 

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:44 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Yaakov Stein; oam@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?
> 
> I think Yaakov is suggesting that the authors of a document 
> might want to get together to discuss its contents.
> 
> A
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
> To: "Yaakov Stein" <yaakov_s@rad.com>; <oam@ietf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 8:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?
> 
> 
> > Cannot this document be discussed in OPSAWG? Same for other 
> documents in
> > the agenda, it looks to me there is home for them in 
> existing WGs - we
> > do not need a distinct gathering. Am I missing something?
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Yaakov Stein [mailto:yaakov_s@rad.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:33 PM
> >> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); oam@ietf.org
> >> Subject: RE: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?
> >>
> >> we = "people participating in the meeting either physically
> >> or via WebEx" OR
> >>      "people following the OAM email list and desiring to
> >> help progress this work"
> >>
> >> purpose = progressing the document Ron proposed
> >>
> >> Y(J)S
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 21:24
> >> To: Yaakov Stein; oam@ietf.org
> >> Subject: RE: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?
> >>
> >> Who is 'we' and what would be the purpose of the meeting?
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: oam-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oam-bounces@ietf.org] On
> >> Behalf Of
> >> > Yaakov Stein
> >> > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 9:19 PM
> >> > To: oam@ietf.org
> >> > Subject: [oam] Do we want to meet informally in Beijing ?
> >> >
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > Even if it is too late to request scheduling of an official
> >> BOF, do we
> >> > want to get together at the upcoming IETF ?
> >> >
> >> > Y(J)S
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > oam mailing list
> >> > oam@ietf.org
> >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oam
> >> >
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > oam mailing list
> > oam@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oam
> > 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
oam mailing list
oam@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oam