[oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1175814] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-26 (OAuth Parameters - oauth-parameters)

Hi Mike, Roman, all,

We've had confirmation from Barry that "IETF" is preferred.

I'll move ahead with the registry actions and use "IETF." If there's a reason to prefer "IESG," let me know.

Best regards,
Amanda

On Mon Sep 07 20:29:02 2020, Michael.Jones@microsoft.com wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing the submissions, Hannes.  We can update the draft
> to consistently use either IETF or IESG.  Roman, the IESG seems to
> have gone back and forth between these two.  Is “IETF” the current
> Change Controller of preference?
> 
> Thanks,
> -- Mike
> 
> From: oauth-ext-review <oauth-ext-review-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf
> Of Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: Monday, September 7, 2020 8:13 AM
> To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>; Nat Sakimura
> <nat@nat.consulting>; drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
> Cc: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1175814] expert review for
> draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-26 (OAuth Parameters - oauth-parameters)
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I reviewed Section 9.1 of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-
> oauth-jwsreq-28 and I am OK with registering the listed parameters.
> Note that these parameters are not meant to be used in practice, as
> the draft says.
> 
> FWIW I noticed that some of the parameters indicate that the IESG is
> the change controller while other parameters say IETF as the change
> controller. I noticed that the IANA registry itself is inconsistent in
> that regard. Ultimately, it does not matter but at least within a
> single document the change controller should either be listed as IETF
> or IESG but not both.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> From: oauth-ext-review <oauth-ext-review-
> bounces@ietf.org<mailto:oauth-ext-review-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf
> Of Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 9:05 AM
> To: Nat Sakimura <nat@nat.consulting<mailto:nat@nat.consulting>>;
> drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org<mailto:drafts-expert-review-
> comment@iana.org>
> Cc: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org<mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1175814] expert review for
> draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-26 (OAuth Parameters - oauth-parameters)
> 
> Hi Nat, Hi all,
> 
> I am back from my sabbatical leave tomorrow and will take a look at it
> tomorrow. Sorry for the delay.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> From: Nat Sakimura <nat@nat.consulting<mailto:nat@nat.consulting>>
> Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2020 10:08 PM
> To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org<mailto:drafts-expert-review-
> comment@iana.org>
> Cc: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org<mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>;
> Hannes Tschofenig
> <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com<mailto:Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>>
> Subject: Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1175814] expert review for
> draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-26 (OAuth Parameters - oauth-parameters)
> 
> Hannes? Could you do the review, please?
> 
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 2:08 AM Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-
> review-comment@iana.org<mailto:drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>>
> wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
> 
> This is a reminder for IANA's OAuth Parameters review request for
> draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq. The document has been approved, but we need
> your review before we can make the registrations.
> 
> thanks,
> Amanda
> 
> On Wed Aug 12 21:04:02 2020, amanda.baber wrote:
> > Dear Hannes,
> >
> > As the designated expert for the OAuth Parameters registry, can you
> > review the registrations in Section 9.1 of this document?
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq
> >
> > The two-week review period would end on August 26th.
> >
> > This document is on tomorrow's IESG telechat agenda, but we're
> > notifying the ADs that it still requires IANA review. (When this
> > document was last sent to IANA, there were no registry actions.)
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Amanda Baber
> > Lead IANA Services Specialist
> 
> _______________________________________________
> oauth-ext-review mailing list
> oauth-ext-review@ietf.org<mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review
> 
> 
> --
> Nat Sakimura
> NAT.Consulting LLC
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose
> the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or
> copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose
> the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or
> copy the information in any medium. Thank you.