Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-incremental-authz-00.txt: AS response for invalid existing_grant

[Vladimir Dzhuvinov <[e-mail]>]

Hi William,

How should the AS respond if the refresh token (existing_grant) is found
to be invalid (for any of the listed reasons)? Ignore the client intent
for incremental authZ or return an error code?

Thanks,

Vladimir


On 28/06/18 23:14, [e-mail] wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : OAuth 2.0 Incremental Authorization
>         Author          : William Denniss
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-oauth-incremental-authz-00.txt
> 	Pages           : 8
> 	Date            : 2018-06-28
>
> Abstract:
>    OAuth 2.0 authorization requests that include every scope the client
>    might ever need can result in over-scoped authorization and a sub-
>    optimal end-user consent experience.  This specification enhances the
>    OAuth 2.0 authorization protocol by adding incremental authorization,
>    the ability to request specific authorization scopes as needed, when
>    they're needed, removing the requirement to request every possible
>    scope that might be needed upfront.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-incremental-authz/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-incremental-authz-00
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-incremental-authz-00
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth