[OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6749 (4819)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 05 October 2016 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FA7129787 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 08:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2PC_s2uU4sXB for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 08:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9981F12958F for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 08:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 82498B80A81; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 08:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
To: dick.hardt@gmail.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net, derek@ihtfp.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20161005151652.82498B80A81@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 08:16:52 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/1gmYkphmm_-HhMqWF7wKstVwijs>
Cc: lars.kemmann@bynalogic.com, oauth@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6749 (4819)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 15:16:57 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749,
"The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6749&eid=4819

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Lars Kemmann <lars.kemmann@bynalogic.com>

Section: 4.2.2

Original Text
-------------
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Location: http://example.com/cb#
          access_token=2YotnFZFEjr1zCsicMWpAA
          &state=xyz&token_type=example&expires_in=3600

Corrected Text
--------------
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Location: http://client.example.com/cb#
          access_token=2YotnFZFEjr1zCsicMWpAA
          &state=xyz&token_type=example&expires_in=3600

Notes
-----
In the example for section 4.2.1, the request was made with a `redirect_uri` parameter value of `redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fclient%2Eexample%2Ecom%2Fcb`. If I understand correctly, the `client` subdomain should be included in the `Location` header in the response.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework
Publication Date    : October 2012
Author(s)           : D. Hardt, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Web Authorization Protocol
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG