Re: [OAUTH-WG] Additional Oauth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol Information

Justin Richer <jricher@mitre.org> Wed, 20 February 2013 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jricher@mitre.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E2221F8619 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:51:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T7zKoEOXpzgl for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:51:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpksrv1.mitre.org (smtpksrv1.mitre.org [198.49.146.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0878621F85F5 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:51:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpksrv1.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A49E53101E2; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:50:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from IMCCAS01.MITRE.ORG (imccas01.mitre.org [129.83.29.78]) by smtpksrv1.mitre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613F653101EC; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:50:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.146.15.29] (129.83.31.58) by IMCCAS01.MITRE.ORG (129.83.29.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.4; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:50:59 -0500
Message-ID: <512528EE.8000303@mitre.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:50:06 -0500
From: Justin Richer <jricher@mitre.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
References: <00ac01ce0fa0$a1325f20$e3971d60$@reminetworks.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436747B862@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436747B862@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060009050904040202070809"
X-Originating-IP: [129.83.31.58]
Cc: Donald F Coffin <donald.coffin@reminetworks.com>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Additional Oauth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol Information
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:51:04 -0000

Additionally, there is an individual draft that registers LRDD Link 
Types for discovery using LRDD and HostMeta:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wmills-oauth-lrdd-07

  -- Justin

On 02/20/2013 02:37 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
>
> Hi Don,
>
> Discovery is a process that happens before Registration, and that's 
> the point at which you would return the AS (and registration!) 
> endpoints to the Client.  The OAuth WG considered doing its own 
> discovery work but ultimately decided to have that happen in the Apps 
> Area WG instead, which is close to completing the WebFinger discovery 
> specification.
>
> If you want to see how OpenID Connect is performing discovery using 
> WebFinger, including discovery of the AS endpoint, have a look at 
> http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-discovery-1_0.html.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> -- Mike
>
> *From:*oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] *On 
> Behalf Of *Donald F Coffin
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:30 AM
> *To:* Justin Richer
> *Cc:* oauth@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Additional Oauth Dynamic Client Registration 
> Protocol Information
>
> Justin,
>
> I understand the current Client Registration request and response 
> information is based on the OPENID model for consistency, but has 
> there been any thought or discussion of adding the AS OAuth 2.0 
> endpoint URIs as part of the registration response?  I believe the 
> addition of the endpoint URIs would make the dynamic client 
> registration process truly a dynamic feature of OAuth 2.0.
>
> If the ability to discover the AS OAuth 2.0 endpoint URIs is being 
> covered by another IETF draft, I'd appreciate learning which current 
> draft is being worked on to achieve that result.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Don
>
> Donald F. Coffin
>
> Founder/CTO
>
> REMI Networks
>
> 22751 El Prado Suite 6216
>
> Rancho Santa Margarita, CA  92688-3836
>
> Phone: (949) 636-8571
>
> Email: donald.coffin@reminetworks.com 
> <mailto:donald.coffin@reminetworks.com>
>