IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -19

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Mon, 25 July 2011 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DAD21F9113 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.058, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTP_ESCAPED_HOST=0.134, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0WbXOOgEMKNJ for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mail3.microsoft.com [131.107.115.214]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1994021F873F for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.174) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:24:10 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC207.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.7.174]) by TK5EX14MLTC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.174]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.002; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:24:09 -0700
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>, OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Draft -19
Thread-Index: AcxKoSoet0pnUU51RLinUDkuShpevgAM6+mw
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:24:09 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394349852A91@TK5EX14MBXC207.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345021F378BF@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345021F378BF@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.37]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394349852A91TK5EX14MBXC207r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -19
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:10:47 -0000

A few editorial points about references:
  - the draft is referencing an old draft of the bearer token spec (-04), rather than the current version (-06),
  - the draft is referencing an old draft  of the SAML bearer spec (-03), rather than the current version (-04),
  - the draft is not referencing the assertions spec draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-00, which would make sense in Section 4.5 (Extensions)

Also, the example in 4.5 should be updated to match the current SAML bearer spec:

   grant_type=http%3A%2F%2Foauth.net%2Fgrant_type%2Fsaml%2F2.0%2F
   bearer&assertion=PEFzc2VydGlvbiBJc3N1ZUluc3RhbnQ9IjIwMTEtMDUtM
   [...omitted for brevity...]V0aG5TdGF0ZW1lbnQ-PC9Bc3NlcnRpb24-

                                                            Thanks,
                                                            -- Mike

From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eran Hammer-Lahav
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 1:07 AM
To: OAuth WG
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -19

Draft 19 includes all the feedback received for -18:

* Closes issues 15-19
* Moved client profiles to section 2.1 from 10
* New text for 'Code Injection and Input Validation'
* A few minor editorial clarifications

There are two open issues (20, 21) which are minor editorial requests, and the request being discussed on the list to change the public/private client type terminology to something else.

I consider draft -19 to be ready for WGLC immediately.

Thanks,

EHL

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email