IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-oauth-v2-12.txt

Skylar Woodward <skylar@kiva.org> Wed, 26 January 2011 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <skylar@kiva.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2BD3A69AB for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:29:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V7+yQbPvz-6p for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na3sys010aog102.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog102.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 54FE83A68D7 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from source ([74.125.82.43]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob102.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTUBavEn/Zu9U1UDViRqX8qxArlfb3bt0@postini.com; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:32:44 PST
Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so1112688wwi.24 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:32:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.7.205 with SMTP id 55mr5120268wep.96.1296063162845; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:32:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from larwmobile.lacantine.lan (LPuteaux-156-16-100-112.w80-12.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.12.80.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m6sm7898462wej.34.2011.01.26.09.32.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:32:41 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Skylar Woodward <skylar@kiva.org>
In-Reply-To: <FFDFD7371D517847AD71FBB08F9A31563848E7CD74@SP2-EX07VS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:32:41 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <155BD4E7-F8B3-4B4A-B02D-EAE2048A2F51@kiva.org>
References: <20110121004501.28103.96097.idtracker@localhost> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723445A8D61C8E@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723445A8D61CBA@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <AANLkTimzOErQhT_gjdQrcawVgfsnr_2RVtTOYRoP-fcR@mail.gmail.com> <1296051184.9984.5.camel@pulse> <FFDFD7371D517847AD71FBB08F9A31563848E7CD74@SP2-EX07VS06.ds.corp.yahoo.com>
To: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-oauth-v2-12.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:29:44 -0000

+1

More feedback on the token specs (and v12) is in my queue for tonight, but this has also been a concern of mine and this seems to be a more elegant protection against conflicts than adding a "version" parameter.

On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:14 PM, William Mills wrote:

>>> Broken record: using a prefix for all registered parameters is
>>> much cleaner (as opposed to requiring that all no-registered
>>> parameters use a prefix).
>> 
>> And once again, a strong +1 to this, even though I know it's far too
>> late to make such a breaking change to the spec. I really think this
>> was
>> a bad decision and is going to come back and bite us in the future.
>> 
>> -- Justin
> 
> Yep.
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email