[OAUTH-WG] Shepherd Write-Up for Dyn-Reg updated

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Mon, 02 March 2015 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C921A8881 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 07:14:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id blPfkZlBsYzJ for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 07:14:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A116E1A88EB for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 07:06:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.131.138] ([80.92.121.102]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MC4y8-1YJcDU2SFU-008rjK for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 16:06:12 +0100
Message-ID: <54F47C62.40606@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 16:06:10 +0100
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
OpenPGP: id=4D776BC9
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QOJ4q717EcK8rpjdx3nkNbqpCVdSIb5mE"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:NBKPgXppO0AzIN5fvhAx7/95ZwFF+c53kQhhup+2lb7uq5xs4Xp TRxJQbyk4rr+oNiJaKOj2nb4u6JHCMuYzR0y3JH7rcaD2xjpixtSAHJkrxqImt06GQfIPkG Rjx1FkxJPq9MPFll91Elzv1Yi8dqs9Y73HQnqpBHTF+HdekvPyuuJhpuFgVDWFwZkgZA+QJ JnP4BE+MJHTPV8j/gsGAg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/7zwjJurJcqcCDIsZ1j5i4glok4U>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd Write-Up for Dyn-Reg updated
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:14:18 -0000

Hi all,

I have updated the shepherd write-up for version 24 of the dynamic
client registration protocol. The update concerned the clarification of
the copyright situation initially raised with this mail:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg13322.html

It turned out that it was better to reach out to the IETF Trust (instead
of sending a mail to Jorge and Scott), which is what Kathleen did. The
discussions concluded that RFC 5378 requires the contributor to assure
the IETF that it has all necessary rights to make the contribution, and
the IETF relies on that assurance in permitting all contributions to be
made. This is what John did in his mail to the list:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg14250.html

Since document updates following discussions with Kathleen also had a
positive impact on my earlier concerns I removed the issues I had with
the document from the shepherd write-up as well.

The most recent version of the shepherd write-up can be found at:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg/shepherdwriteup/

Ciao
Hannes