[OAUTH-WG] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp-02

Yoav Nir via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 06 November 2021 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietf.org
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662733A11A7; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 15:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Yoav Nir via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, oauth@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.39.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <163623641036.23265.3678140155645804989@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 15:06:50 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/8y88CWvwlJM5WOKNQDrBiZESc7c>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp-02
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2021 22:06:50 -0000

Reviewer: Yoav Nir
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
 Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

The draft is clear and well-written. The Security Considerations section
specifically is comprehensive and clear.

My one suggestion would be to move the first paragraph in the Security
Considerations section to the Introduction. It is about the attack and about
the protocol in the document being effective against the attack. It's not
really a consideration in the way that the rest of the section is.