Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-03.txt

Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com> Thu, 28 February 2013 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <sberyozkin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456F521F8835 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:04:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t5Aay08QQHuR for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:04:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-f52.google.com (mail-ee0-f52.google.com [74.125.83.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF4921F8860 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:04:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b15so1651865eek.39 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:04:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rF+Y62vNF+e9NT29OoWBC+OB35Dp3T3/SbbOuVqHlUQ=; b=RSvaHYGsfTeYmBSXcGwmj6APu7U81HdPqIXWkNOLQ6+JW5liBLlG00WeeRTnTrSkzq xoZ/XCgBwaaZEtfROlhbZWDMSjXuz0tB1QgOVCFE4K4vCatttdgK1hmvTS+WNUH4+vAN Ehc9Kmz1lZQSd44tunax0sYpEruQlC15ZG7OpgxOjW214oF0K24qANJHVqErbM/eMVRb +3sPzBYX3mmNWNO3wUcMUhuYN3EiPQWDCd/8qsjAvuTAjP5sBmFNlr5TKbNfCBnMNdOl PFZPvZ6gDN1wOyVs+UrXMJertDnVFGUOyK3p+7LjWr7tFI6P4SC6fCkO39G18K2cF8vH pmyg==
X-Received: by 10.14.0.73 with SMTP id 49mr18713173eea.21.1362071071874; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:04:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] ([79.97.76.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t4sm12828045eel.0.2013.02.28.09.04.30 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Feb 2013 09:04:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <512F8E1D.2060408@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:04:29 +0000
From: Sergey Beryozkin <sberyozkin@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: oauth@ietf.org
References: <20130225124642.7425.65145.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1361956373.9883.YahooMailNeo@web31807.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <21030204-8EA7-4FB0-9DD3-2B6C8CA57E02@gmx.net> <1362057295.36069.YahooMailNeo@web31809.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1362057295.36069.YahooMailNeo@web31809.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-03.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:04:35 -0000

Hi
On 28/02/13 13:14, William Mills wrote:
> I'm actually advocating that we change MAC to be a JWT extension.
IMHO, having a simpler option, plus, going forward, a possible JWT 
profile (client to RS path) would work better -

Why would JWT completely take over ? May be it should be possible indeed 
to have it as a JWT extension - should it be part of the relevant JWT 
assertion spec, where JWT is used as a possible grant ?

Thanks, Sergey
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
> *To:* William Mills <wmills_92105@yahoo.com>
> *Cc:* Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>; "oauth@ietf.org"
> <oauth@ietf.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 28, 2013 2:28 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-03.txt
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> I believe you are misreading the document. In
> draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac the client still uses the MAC when it
> accesses a protected resource.
> The only place where the JWT comes into the picture is with the
> description of the access token. This matters from a key distribution
> point of view. The session key for the MAC is included in the encrypted
> JWT. The JWT is encrypted by the authorization server and decrypted by
> the resource server.
>
> Information about how header fields get included in the MAC is described
> in Section 5.
>
> The nonce isn't killed it is just called differently: seq-nr. The stuff
> in the original MAC specification actually wasn't a nonce (from the
> semantic point of view).
> The extension parameter is there implicitly by allowing additional
> header fields to be included in the MAC computation.
>
> I need to look at the port number field again.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> On Feb 27, 2013, at 11:12 AM, William Mills wrote:
>
>  > Just read the draft quickly.
>  >
>  > Since we're now leaning on JWT do we need to include the token in
> this? Why not just make an additional "Envelope MAC" thing and have the
> signature include the 3 JWT parts in the signature base string? That
> object then just becomes a JSON container for the kid, timestamp,
> signature method, signature etc. That thing then is a 4th base64 encoded
> JSON thing in the auth header.
>  >
>  > How header fields get included in the signature needs definition.
>  >
>  > Why did you kill the port number, nonce, and extension parameter out
> of the signature base string?
>  >
>  > The BNF appears to have no separators between values.
>  >
>  > -bill
>  >
>  >
>  > From: "internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>"
> <internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
>  > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>
>  > Cc: oauth@ietf.org <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
>  > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 4:46 AM
>  > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-03.txt
>  >
>  >
>  > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  > This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol Working
> Group of the IETF.
>  >
>  > Title : OAuth 2.0 Message Authentication Code (MAC) Tokens
>  > Author(s) : Justin Richer
>  > William Mills
>  > Hannes Tschofenig
>  > Filename : draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-03.txt
>  > Pages : 26
>  > Date : 2013-02-25
>  >
>  > Abstract:
>  > This specification describes how to use MAC Tokens in HTTP requests
>  > to access OAuth 2.0 protected resources. An OAuth client willing to
>  > access a protected resource needs to demonstrate possession of a
>  > crytographic key by using it with a keyed message digest function to
>  > the request.
>  >
>  > The document also defines a key distribution protocol for obtaining a
>  > fresh session key.
>  >
>  >
>  > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>  > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac
>  >
>  > There's also a htmlized version available at:
>  > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-03
>  >
>  > A diff from the previous version is available at:
>  > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-v2-http-mac-03
>  >
>  >
>  > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>  > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > OAuth mailing list
>  > OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
>  > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth