Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6749 (3904)

[Kawasaki Takahiko <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

I made an errata report for RFC 6749 (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization
Framework).

  http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6749&eid=3904

Is there any next action I should take? Is the errata reviewed without my
further action?

Best Regards,
Takahiko Kawasaki



2014-03-01 23:14 GMT+09:00 RFC Errata System <[e-mail]>:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749,
> "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6749&eid=3904
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Takahiko Kawasaki <[e-mail]>
>
> Section: 11.2.2.
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    o  Parameter name: error
>    o  Parameter usage location: authorization response, token response
>    o  Change controller: IETF
>    o  Specification document(s): RFC 6749
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> "error" is missing and should be added to the list of Initial Registry
> Contents of OAuth Parameters Registry.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework
> Publication Date    : October 2012
> Author(s)           : D. Hardt, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Web Authorization Protocol
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>