IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-fett-oauth-dpop-00

Daniel Fett <danielf+oauth@yes.com> Wed, 03 April 2019 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <danielf+oauth@yes.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC44612010F for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 08:39:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yes.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ANLPIInGGfyg for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 08:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FF80120112 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 08:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id q16so7920181wmj.3 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 08:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yes.com; s=google; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=z4dQb439ZK4+5kvv0Y0gpiS0rhs9Par+tljLV+IYapM=; b=mi0V3h/bPyopQybnDplryoAY2s27lh6B8PJKtDnbTIu28c7MzehHz8c/K2aUcxGIcr 1kaSlgkJYC7hn/rPzLdQJCgA3Bw8abUEs7v1fYvBw1X/pwMX0VzWrGy4S/d3EK+7yj4P 5th1CsEdh6mnvkfdUDoX3DuUvZnCyY10HNSnyV91ct0PIwIiqKajvw7zG00aY/sdOoVx +b7mXSe1XTX3k5C19ofXGeBYRiI4bFjSoSwIFjxMK/6faIg9yXUxPpQTidgvxMR2uJRs AMuoR+RqV+nvb1O85lauydY2dqE5R7+NJ/p19Gm6VBjLCuLT9rAEvMD53/ly8M5sVMf2 dtaQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=z4dQb439ZK4+5kvv0Y0gpiS0rhs9Par+tljLV+IYapM=; b=MmIVGUy9R9tnNenthP7xMVsr0yYiTFqAnok4ze3IId4SM8j79Fw2XtlAOgez5Nb22C XI2rKa+QtL5Nj9tTRcDF+JHX82oTRnJiWwIc2G2KXJ+2RO60O+KB9qrrc7UQO4Dzk2el EqnOY6swx6CxYlo5HNOJrryYF/ar5FWTcaLfX4OF62+TqGqJAlsSw3rmEM8V4vxP6cEQ DX18MWDqdpILEgs5Qw0DWjhT3YN8dWQaXLQcCAeQjQUk/QEW+nP2cbJ0xJMO4wOfbG+S rI2qpZQ/lXJLP5xPgUCoalOz30wFulN3W3siLgI8eGo1CyiLyHTUiiQOLyDQp/OMdou3 1TMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUjgCeyQNB8+0+BsUjygf3Qk8PHu8th3CLz3clZOE1X5QZfvchw 9L3pORaDFYN84lJIDPwefQ8bhjCdbsE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzP6HGtrXAZsMxw5o8J/4pNiUm2j299k+8ev98+cri5oKuLTEQo0sUHFM2gQ6BIzxuvmcXstg==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c8:: with SMTP id 191mr522893wma.44.1554305988655; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 08:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2003:c1:4f3d:8900:8469:f3c7:4155:524a? (p200300C14F3D89008469F3C74155524A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:c1:4f3d:8900:8469:f3c7:4155:524a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o10sm20472987wru.54.2019.04.03.08.39.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Apr 2019 08:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: George Fletcher <gffletch@aol.com>, oauth@ietf.org
References: <0a9af6f6-1b5d-244d-06af-9d14461b1d69@yes.com> <4c849a55-013c-c606-8877-ae39a6ab79ff@aol.com>
From: Daniel Fett <danielf+oauth@yes.com>
Message-ID: <435a1adb-6293-8745-96e8-d608f7dd934f@yes.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 17:39:46 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4c849a55-013c-c606-8877-ae39a6ab79ff@aol.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E01E819BEDE30B3CE1720001"
Content-Language: de-DE
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/IaCwaWfDgiZgS5dXzocC8-Q0XAI>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-fett-oauth-dpop-00
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 15:39:53 -0000

This is fixed in -01:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fett-oauth-dpop-01

-Daniel

Am 03.04.19 um 17:28 schrieb George Fletcher:
> A quick question regarding...
>
>    o  "http_uri": The HTTP URI used for the request, without query and
>       fragment parts (REQUIRED).
>
> Is 'without' supposed to be 'with' ? The example shows the http_uri
> *with* the query parameters :)
>
> On 3/28/19 6:17 AM, Daniel Fett wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I published the first version of the DPoP draft at
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fett-oauth-dpop-00
>>
>> Abstract
>>
>>    This document defines a sender-constraint mechanism for OAuth 2.0
>>    access tokens and refresh tokens utilizing an application-level
>>    proof-of-possession mechanism based on public/private key pairs.
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback I received so far from John, Mike, Torsten,
>> and others during today's session or before!
>>
>> If you find any errors I would welcome if you open an issue in the
>> GitHub repository at https://github.com/webhamster/draft-dpop
>>
>> - Daniel   
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email