IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Tue, 03 January 2017 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6F6129B38 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:45:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uDeN7S2d6Xha for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:45:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67D32129B35 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:45:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id h201so246274031qke.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 11:45:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ve7jtb-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=IHi/qtjnAzy+nqIglP7mb1hia1ChrAwy7FEZqlrMbWw=; b=IIA29GCinQXQKOT2tmq9cUXXGIrLflfuMddgkp83Iamy+CT0RVk21qfs5DY1JKopT1 YYF3zA73aN1RTMz5f9yCeAYzRGE5oInOhG/jOxCyzlu2kXn5NobDAYADunqvmX6sIpxY 38pZ5VxiGiV++GTmHGkAUfvDKLtaVIcl8LiqPG7ZuDWqRqM7F6Zf+vwgKtecxiaxqDXj 4Wz3jTz2aeKjmV5dOCgzECWb07QG+1912LScK3lNP/UHUS4eLD7KlELvWmMwVoWxjYkH fHZv/YcBCGNgFXtExNuc7VV5Ae1PDwG7Lp3yfZ7rX8UlUPiYNpyl1sFmLRZQ1pV2Za0Q 4xQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=IHi/qtjnAzy+nqIglP7mb1hia1ChrAwy7FEZqlrMbWw=; b=eR8ZdBKIRN5Ybua2WTYzWlW2jLmvLJSfBqOAe0BbEfuFCVGhWKP2aGTcypusig11M7 feSNl2vx/ivowpnJNQ1+KtUZwXQciRds5QlDXspB/bVFweG9T3X6r2ElI5qBOh+C6z+2 dyqsqb2ganmzXLablXQfo4gfw5SofePVs3LZIewOnOum3msnEJk3KUpAUY+AGvzecDfO VVNjCxS8DCgRcLqQwLTVdeLPR1RIJdihkCqUZcE6MVuTwg+9kBF9tiLfkC1XZgt3OmYu JuJZ/xaZY/ls2FMYqqHTfYWQIwA1IiFA3Uiw3S6qwJsjXxQMJTeHYIGLqtUFNR/sLXEw Sqmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIOhHqQCpaj3X9FPpH9u0+ujGoBu7PnpTjHUdY8ebTizXguUC0Jr9AHBn5qMU+H7oKN
X-Received: by 10.55.91.193 with SMTP id p184mr61259228qkb.301.1483472745477; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 11:45:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jbradley-r.lan ([191.115.70.183]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x40sm44232026qtx.12.2017.01.03.11.45.42 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Jan 2017 11:45:44 -0800 (PST)
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
Message-Id: <9819C8B0-E1DB-47E0-9639-F85CACA8DB23@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9A343615-204E-4D63-B682-F05ECD6C9A83"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:45:10 -0300
In-Reply-To: <CABzCy2DzYxU-EMiA4QCpggawMCMPsw+5pyFsza_gnuhn3hGfqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>
References: <CAHbuEH4Vxdda4yUH932GEZjEiLi1KdYU9_1MLoLAn_AZA=41Yw@mail.gmail.com> <CABzCy2BoAYtpsbU6Pi3rimVOdQcsop=P5k3-+9BLoNXmi8Pc9w@mail.gmail.com> <aad3663c-aed1-61d9-5356-58c1e6f94bd2@free.fr> <CABzCy2DzYxU-EMiA4QCpggawMCMPsw+5pyFsza_gnuhn3hGfqQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/IykWbAaJF0jU9q7vftRyY_q_By4>
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 19:45:48 -0000

Snip
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 2:36 PM, Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 2) On page 9 the text states:
> The authorization request object MUST be either
>    (a)  JWS signed; or
>    (b)  JWE encrypted; or
>    (c)  JWS signed and JWE encrypted.
>  
> This should be replaced by:
> The authorization request object MUST be either
>    (a)  JWS signed; 
>    (b)  JWE encrypted (when secret keys are being used); or
>    (c)  JWS signed and JWE encrypted.
> 
> That's acceptable. (Thanks for amending your proposal after several private exchanges.)  
> 


Secret is not a clear term to use.  It should be JWE encrypted (when symmetric keys are bing used)  
The private part of a RSA keypair is also secret.

John B.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email