[OAUTH-WG] Section 7.3 "token_type" vs. section 3.5.3.2 "secret_type"
Andrew Arnott <andrewarnott@gmail.com> Fri, 07 May 2010 02:02 UTC
Return-Path: <andrewarnott@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48ADA3A695F for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2010 19:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.739
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yyWgobBHDRek for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 May 2010 19:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5984A3A68C8 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 May 2010 19:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gwaa12 with SMTP id a12so388614gwa.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 May 2010 19:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PT9eK1Y+aYcznE98j3urDtgnyLRqINZOZDKVBPNFYAU=; b=oO7p/d4WkzHs6wINdW6VX6LUx7IAoApfczAS70ucEGsyyfLEpXuobPbwBxhJGtBDEI Ald8CJ1iGOeQbDeMRSXE8njmpQH6oDoUCgAZwtP8+Tnz7+7GjLOl4Emm+4C1qvRkjpEG n1hNJIa0j4RR0shzH0Q1YCAMVTgF8NZckIKsY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=VwLcjtqd/WWp3IykeXlO0NsArMroZECp1EQ+fVBV+QOWpUuoNT/aiZoUCIP1lafMTD 1pC40vhSUTQFznYEevhmO0wP/nDwiEtUoSvU02VlfntLfl6mAPDRkS/O4gkIhyyQxZLt x9+Mb4TlIooRrA+E1YKo6NtFRORPw1tjSPzNY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.172.42 with SMTP id u42mr2667603ybe.113.1273197717568; Thu, 06 May 2010 19:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.151.105.17 with HTTP; Thu, 6 May 2010 19:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 19:01:57 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTilQVZ6ug4t0nN7gIL28QgkNhqwhV4i_E_Zg6J3W@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Arnott <andrewarnott@gmail.com>
To: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd5cb00af446d0485f77171"
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.3 "token_type" vs. section 3.5.3.2 "secret_type"
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 02:02:14 -0000
I think there's a typo in section 7.3 of the latest draft. It mentions a token_type and that's the only place that parameter name appears. But sections that refer to 7.3 have a parameter named secret_type so maybe that's what it should be. -- Andrew Arnott "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre
- [OAUTH-WG] Section 7.3 "token_type" vs. section 3… Andrew Arnott