Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda requests, please

I’d like 10-15 minutes of agenda time to discuss this draft:

·        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-token-exchange-01

I support Nat presenting the two drafts below and the rest of the agenda suggestions that have been made.

I believe we should have an all-up discussion on the next steps for the proof-of-possession drafts, and will contribute, but don’t feel compelled to present.

The one draft that’s pertinent to the proof-of-possession work that I don’t believe has come up in the agenda-setting is http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-richer-oauth-signed-http-request-01.  I realize that this might be problematic to discuss, since Justin may not be able to attend, but I wanted us to at least consider whether to include this in the discussions.

Looking forward to seeing many of you in Toronto!

                                                            -- Mike

From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nat Sakimura
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 8:28 AM
To: Justin Richer
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda requests, please

I would like to bring up the request by JWS draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl-05 and Symmetric PoP draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse-03.

=nat via iPhone

On Jul 3, 2014, at 12:14, Justin Richer <jricher@MIT.EDU<mailto:jricher@MIT.EDU>> wrote:
Mike is working on editorial updates to the Dynamic Registration core draft, and I and the other editors plan to review the changes soon and we'll get an updated draft published before the deadline this week.

I will publish a refreshed Token Introspection individual submission ID for input into the WG discussion before the deadline, and I would like to see this become a WG item. It's already been in deployment with a number of implementations for some time now, and I'm seeing only increasing demand for it.

I do not agree that we should drop the Dynamic Registration Management draft from the WG items list.

 -- Justin

On 7/2/2014 10:06 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:

Hi all,

by next Monday we have to post a draft agenda for the upcoming IETF

meeting.

If you would like to talk about a specific topic, please let us know.

My impression regarding the status of our work is the following:

-------- Current WG items -------

* Dynamic Client Registration

We are waiting for an update but the document could be completed by the

IETF meeting. ==> no presentation time.

* JWT

Currently in IESG processing and a new draft update has just been

submitted. ==> no presentation time (#)

* Assertion Bundle

Currently in IESG processing. ==> no presentation time (#)

* Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol

We had a discussion about this work at the last IETF meeting and the

path forward looked somewhat difficult. Nothing has happened since that

time and I am inclined to remove it from the list of WG items.

* Proof-of-Possession Security

We have several new documents and I hope we can turn into working group

items already before the meeting. We would then use the meeting time to

discuss open issues.

#: No presentation time unless some challenging comments from the IESG

surface.

-------- Proposed New WG items -------

I would also like to put the following items on the agenda.

* Token Introspection

* draft-sakimura-oauth-tcse-03

-------- Other items -------

Phil might want to bring up this item since it was discussed on the

list: draft-hunt-oauth-v2-user-a4c

Other ideas/suggestions?

Ciao

Hannes

_______________________________________________

OAuth mailing list

OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth